Hip Soceity home
Goals and Mission
Hip Soceity Officers
Upcoming Events and Announcements
Educational Offerings
Hip Soceity Awards
Hip Links
Members Only Area

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hip Society THE HIP SOCIETY

MEETING OF THE HIP SOCIETY

Thirty-Third Open Scientific Meeting

The Eleventh Combined Open Meeting Hip Society and AAHKS

Washington, D.C.

February 26, 2005

PROGRAM CHAIRMAN

Robert Barrack, M.D.

CONTENTS:

Program

Abstracts

Hip Society Officers

AAHKS Officers

COURSE OBJECTIVES: The objective of the Open Meeting of The Hip Society is provide information on what is known today about arthroplasty and nonarthroplasty options for the treatment of hip disease.  In addition, this years meeting will provide unbiased, up-to-date information on current topics of interest to the hip surgeon, including minimal incision hip surgery, new bearing surfaces and revision techniques.

COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is divided into six sessions.  The first session will address techniques and pitfalls of MIS.  In the second session, nonarthroplasty options for the patient will be discussed.  This will be followed by the Presidential Guest Speaker who will share his incite on the clinical and economic impact of a national hip registry.  The third session will focus on arthroplasty options for the young patient focusing on bearing surfaces.  The four session will discuss advances in perioperative management.  The Hip Society Awards paper will follow this. The fifth session will demonstrate revision techniques and indications with a series of surgical videos.  Finally, there will be a symposium on current controversies in THA including such topics as computer assisted surgery, DVT prophylaxis, and the prevention and treatment of instability.

 INTENDED AUDIENCE: The intended audience is orthopedic surgeons and orthopaedic residents.

Program:

8:00 a.m.

Opening Remarks

Richard White, M.D.

 

SESSION I:      

MINIMAL INCISION SURGERY:  TECHNIQUE AND PITFALLS

Moderator:   Richard White, M.D.

Albuquerque, NM

 

8:05 a.m.

Single Incision Posterior THA

Lawrence Dorr, M.D.

Los Angeles, CA

 

8:12 a.m.

Single Incision Anterolateral THA

Cecil Rorabeck, M.D.

London,  Ontario

 

8:19 a.m.

Two Incision THA

Michael Tanzer, M.D.

Montreal,  Quebec

 

8:26 a.m.

Single Incision Anterior with Pro-Fracture Table

Joel Matta, M.D.

Los Angeles, CA

 

8:32 a.m.

Single Incision Anterior Surface Replacement

Michael Mont, M.D.

Baltimore, MD

 

8:39 a.m.

Single Incision Posterior Surface Replacement

Derek McMinn, M.D.

Birmingham, U.K.

 

8:46 a.m.

Complications of MIS

Aaron Rosenberg, M.D.

Chicago,  IL

 

8:53 a.m.

Discussion

 

SESSION II:  

NONARTHROPLASTY OPTIONS FOR THE YOUNG PATIENT:  

INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUES

Moderator:  Miguel Cabanela, M.D.

Rochester, MN

 

9:09 a.m.

Dislocation/Open Intraarticular Surgery

Reinhold Ganz, M.D.

Berne, Switzerland

 

9:17 a.m.

Femoral and Acetabular Osteotomy

Richard Santore, M.D.

San Diego, CA

 

9:25 a.m.

Hip Arthroscopy

Joseph McCarthy, M.D.

Boston, MA

 

9:33 a.m.

Hip Arthrodesis

Dennis Burke, M.D.

Boston,  MA

 

9:41 a.m.

Algorithm for Nonarthroplasty Options

John Clohisy, M.D.

St. Louis,  MO

 

9:49 a.m.

Discussion

 

10:00 a.m.

Introduction of Presidential Guest Speaker

Richard White, M.D.

Albuquerque, NM

 

10:02 a.m. 

Presidential Guest Speaker: The Impact of a National Registry

Henrik Malchau, M.D.

Boston, MA

 

10:20 a.m.

Break

 

SESSION III:

ARTHROPLASTY OPTIONS FOR THE YOUNG PATIENT: 

INDICATIONS, PROS AND CONS

Moderator: William Harris, M.D.

Boston, MA

 

10:40 a.m.

Metal-Metal THA

John Cuckler, M.D.

Birmingham, AL

 

10:48 a.m.

Metal-Metal Surface Replacement

Thomas Schmalzried, M.D.

Los Angeles,  CA

 

10:56 a.m.

Metal on Cross-Linked PE

William Maloney, M.D.

Palo Alto, CA

 

11:04 a.m.

Oxinium on Cross-Linked PE

Robert Bourne, M.D.

London, Ontario

 

11:12 a.m.

Ceramic-Ceramic

James D’Antonio, M.D.

Moon Township, PA

 

11:20 a.m.

Discussion

 

SESSION IV:

PERIOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT IN THA

Moderator: Mary O’Connor, M.D.

Jacksonville, FL

 

11:35 a.m.

Advances in Anesthetic Techniques

Thomas Vail, M.D.

Durham, NC

 

11:42 a.m.

Postoperative Pain Management

Douglas Dennis, M.D.

Denver, CO

 

11:49 a.m.

Accelerated Postoperative Rehabilitation

Richard Rothman, M.D.

Philadelphia, PA

 

11:56 a.m.

Patient Education to Promote Success

Richard Coutts, M.D.

San Diego, CA

 

12:03 p.m.

Discussion

 

12:15-1:30 pm

Lunch

 

1:30 p.m.

Hip Society Awards

Daniel Berry, M.D. - Education Committee Chair

Rochester, MN

 

1:30 p.m.

The Otto Aufranc Award

 

1:40 p.m.

The John Charnley Award

 

1:50 p.m.

The Frank Stinchfield Award

 

2:00 p.m.

Discussion

 

2:10 p.m.

Hip Highlights from the ORS

Richard Coutts, M.D.

San Diego, CA

 

SESSION V:

REVISION TECHNIQUES AND INDICATIONS, VIDEOS

Moderator: Clive Duncan, M.D.

Vancouver, B.C.

 

2:25 p.m.

Component Removal

Daniel Berry, M.D.

Rochester, MN

 

2:33 p.m.

Treating Osteolysis

Harry Rubash, M.D.

Boston, MA

 

2:41 p.m.

Modular Acetabular Solutions

Wayne Paprosky, M.D.

Chicago, IL

 

2:49 p.m.

Weber Technique

Karl Zweymuller, M.D.

Vienna, Austria

 

2:57 p.m.

Impaction Grafting, femur and acetabulum

Miguel Cabanela, M.D.

Rochester, MN

 

3:05 p.m.

Trochanteric Reattachment

Robert Barrack, M.D.

St. Louis, MO

 

3:13 p.m.

Modular Stems

William Hozack, M.D.

Philadelphia, PA

 

3:21 p.m.

Discussion

 

SESSION VI:

CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN THA

Moderator: Robert Barrack, M.D.

St. Louis, MO

 

3:35 p.m.

Current Status of DVT Prophylaxis

Jay Lieberman, M.D.

Los Angeles, CA

 

3:42 p.m.

Preventing And Treating Infection, Antibiotic Cement, One Vs Two Stage,

Resistant Organisms, New Antibiotics

Arlen Hanssen, M.D.

Rochester, MN

 

3:49 p.m.

New Strategies to Prevent and Treat Instability

John Callaghan, M.D.

Iowa City, IA

 

3:56 p.m.

Update on Computer Assisted THA

David Stulberg, M.D.

Chicago, IL

 

4:03 p.m.

Current Role THA in Acute Fractures

Robert Trousdale, M.D.

Rochester, MN

 

4:10 p.m.

Role of Non-operative Modalities

David Hungerford, M.D.

Baltimore, MD

 

4:17 p.m.

Update on AVN treatment

Thomas Thornhill, M.D.

Boston, MA

 

4:24 p.m.

Imaging Around THA

Charles Engh, M.D.

Arlington, VA

 

4:31 p.m.

Discussion

 

4:45 p.m.

Adjourn

 

Abstracts:

8:05 a.m.

Posterior Mini Incision THR

Lawrence D. Dorr, M.D.

This exposure is the safest, simplest, and most effective of the small incisions.   The technique is a skin incision 8 to 9 cm along the posterior border of the greater trochanter.   There are three cuts of hip tissue: 

  1. The gluteus maximus is incised 6-8 cm (dynamic EMG at 6 weeks shows muscle function normal);

  2. Posterior capsule is incised 3-4 cm from superior border of quadratus through the piriformis tendon.  The quadratus is preserved;

  3. The medial capsule has a longitudinal incision to the transverse acetabular ligament.

The Mayo clinic cadaver study shows there is less muscle damage with this incision than with the two-incision technique.   Instruments #1-9 maximize exposure with skin protection.   No Charnley is used because it increases skin tension, interferes with other retractors, and prevents a "mobile window".  Acetabular and femoral component positioning have the same accuracy as with a long incision.

8:12 a.m.

The Mini Incision As Compared To A Standard Incision For Primary Total Hip
Arthroplasty Via The Direct Lateral Approach

Cecil H. Rorabeck, M.D. F.R.C.S.C. and David A.L. O’Brien, M.D. F.R.C.S.C.

Patients are inquiring about mini incision primary total hip arthroplasty with increasing frequency. To date there have been no published randomized controlled trials to substantiate claims that the mini approach is better than a standard approach. The purpose of our study was to review our initial experience with the mini incision technique through the direct lateral approach with the intent of implementing a randomized controlled trial if the approach could be shown to be safe and effective. A consecutive series of 87 primary total hip arthroplasties, 34 of which were performed through a mini incision direct lateral approach, were retrospectively compared.  Significance (p<0.05) was found in Length of stay (p=0.014), OR Time (p=0.048), BMI (p=0.038), and Discharge Location (p=0.038).  No Significance was found in Weight, Height, Age at Surgery, Transfusion Incidence, Incidence of Intra-op Fracture, Post-op Complications, Fixation, ASA Score, Cup Abduction Angle and finally Stem Alignment. Criticisms of this study are the obvious bias demonstrated toward using the mini-incision in patients of less BMI, which could influence the other variables, and the lack of controlled randomization. The study does demonstrate that the approach is safe to continue further study, as there was no increase in complications or in component mal-positioning.

(Level III Evidence, Therapeutic Study)

8:19 a.m.

Two Incision THA – Technique and Pitfalls

Michael Tanzer, M.D., F.R.C.S.C.

The 2-incison THA is a novel surgical technique that combines two standard orthopaedic surgical approaches with fluoroscopic guidance, conventional hip implants and specialized instrumentation. The goal of this procedure is to minimize soft tissue trauma, thereby reducing postoperative morbidity and accelerate rehabilitation.

The surgical procedure is performed with the patient supine on a radiolucent table. Two separate, 4-5 cm incisions are used to create a direct pathway to the acetabulum and the femur. An oblique incision along the femoral neck allows the acetabulum to be exposed through a traditional Smith-Peterson approach. This surgical interval is both internervous and intermuscular and therefore requires no muscle dissection. After removal of the femoral head, the entire acetabulum can be visualized, prepared with specialized reamers and a conventional cementless cup and liner can be implanted with an offset inserter. Aside from the skin incision and femoral neck cut, fluoroscopy is not essential for exposure and implantation of the acetabular component.

The second incision is used to prepare and implant the femoral component.  A point coaxial to the femur in both the coronal and sagittal planes is used to create an oblique incision in the posterior lateral buttock. Using both the anterior and posterior incisions, a pathway from the posterior incision, through the piriformis fossa and into the femoral canal is created. This surgical approach is analogous to a femoral rodding and requires only incising the Gluteus Maximus fascia and a small split in the muscle. Then with the aid of fluoroscopy, palpation and direct visualization from the anterior incision, the femur is prepared with specialized instrumentation and a conventional cementless femoral component is implanted. The prosthetic neck is then brought through the capsule with traction to allow placement of the head and reduction of the hip through the anterior incision.

This novel surgical technique for hip arthroplasty requires a period of adjustment to the specialized instrumentation and the new orientation of common anatomic landmarks. As a result, specialized training and special attention to patient selection, preoperative templating and meticulous surgical technique are required to minimize complications and help ensure success.

8:26 a.m.

Anterior Approach for THA on the Orthopedic Table

Joel M. Matta, M.D., Tania Ferguson, M.D. and Cambize Shahrdar, M.D.

The anterior approach is also called the Heuter Approach or the Short Smith-Pete Approach. It is performed on the OSI PROfx table to facilitate femoral access.  It is minimally invasive because it preserves the muscle attachments to the pelvis and femur and also does not disrupt the “Hip Deltoid”.  I adopted this technique to minimize the chance of post-op dislocation and to accelerate the recovery rate.

From September 1996 through September 2004 I performed 651 anterior approach THA including 523 primaries (the subject of this report), 98 hips with previous surgery, and 29 revisions.

This is a consecutive unselected series of 523 primary THA in 465 patients (58 bilateral).  The maximum BMI is 57.  Operative time averages 1.5 hours.   The incision length averages 10 cm.  Leg length discrepancy averages 3 mm, with a standard deviation of 4 and a maximum of 10 mm.  Acetabular abduction averages 41° with a standard deviation of 4 (range 33° to 49°).  Acetabular anteversion averages 23°, with a standard deviation of 5 (range 9° to 38°).  Complications include: 1 infection, 2 anterior dislocations, 1 posterior dislocation, 0 recurrent dislocations, and 1 femoral nerve palsy (recovered).

The time for patients to begin walking without external support at a median of 8 days.  Patients terminate the use of external support at a median of 15 days.

The anterior approach requires no post-op dislocation precautions and facilitates early functional recovery.  It is a minimally invasive technique applicable to all primary hip patients, does not increase complications or operative time or compromise accuracy of acetabular position or leg length.

Consult: www.hipandpelvis.com

8:32 a.m.

Minimally Invasive Total Joint Arthroplasty

Michael A. Mont, M.D., Phillip S. Ragland, M.D.,
Hari P. Bezwada, M.D. and Craig M. Thomas, M.D.

Minimally invasive total joint arthroplasty has recently received tremendous attention.  Motivating factors have included increased patient demand, increased surgeon interest, orthopaedic device marketing, and physician driven marketing.  In addition, specific patient focused factors have become important, including a reduction in post-operative pain, shorter rehabilitation, and the potential for outpatient surgery. 

From August 1, 2003 to November 30, 2003, we performed 30 mini-incision metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasties and compared them to a similar age and disease matched control group of standard total hip arthroplasties performed during the previous three months.  The minimal incision surgical approach was anterolateral with an average incision length of 8 cm. (range, 7 to 9 cm.).  The incision length in the traditional incision group averaged 22 cm. (range, 16 to 30 cm.).  There was no significant difference in operative time between the groups.  However, there was slightly less intraoperative bleeding in the mini-incision group, yet the overall transfusion rate was not substantially different.  The length of stay was also very similar between the groups.  Post-operative visual analogue pain scores were slightly better in the mini-incision group.  There was no difference in HHS between the groups at three months.

All groups had similar outcomes by three months.  It appears that results can be similar utilizing small incisions for resurfacing hip arthroplasty.

8:39 a.m.

Single Incision Posterior Surface Replacement

Derek McMinn, M.D. and Joseph Daniel, M.D.

Hip Resurfacing has always been an attractive concept for the treatment of hip arthritis in younger patients. Introduction of modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in 1991 in Birmingham, UK made this concept a reality. In the early years, resurfacings were used only by a few experienced surgeons. From 1997, Birmingham Hip Resurfacings (BHR’s) are being widely used. At a 3.7 to 10.8 year follow-up (mean follow-up 5.8 years), the cumulative survival rate of metal-metal resurfacing in young active patients with osteoarthritis is 99.8%. None of these patients were constrained to change their occupational or leisure activities following the procedure. The overall revision rate of BHR’s in all ages and all diagnoses is also very low (19 out of 2167  [0.88%] with a maximum follow-up of 7.5 years).

This procedure can now be performed through a minimal approach developed by the senior author using a single posterior incision. 232 consecutive BHR’s (209 patients) performed through this approach between January and December 2004 have been studied. Mean incision length was 11.8 cm. 77% of the incisions were between 9 and 12 cm. Body mass index of these patients ranged from 17.6 to 46.7.

Differences between the traditional and minimal posterior approaches in terms of operating time, length of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, alignment of the components and postoperative creatine kinase were looked at in smaller groups of patients. Although objective evidence does not support the fact that the longer approach was any more invasive than the minimal route, patient feedback shows that it is very popular. While minimal approach is indeed appealing, it has a steep learning curve. In the early phase of this curve, care should be taken to avoid the potential risk of suboptimal component placement, which can adversely affect long-term outcome.

8:46 a.m.

Complications of Minimally Invasive THA

Aaron Rosenberg, M.D.

Less invasive hip replacement is currently being performed by a variety of modifications of routine approaches including the posterior, anterior, and antero-lateral. The removal of standard visual and other cues during the performance of these less invasive procedures may require the development of alternate feedback methodologies, which may not be immediately assimilated or perfectly integrated into surgical technique. Thus the overall complication rate may rise while these cues and the appropriate response to them mature or alternate methods of incorporating similar or comparable information is developed.

Much of the earliest reports are from highly experienced surgeons who are  “pushing the envelope” in perfecting these techniques. Complications reported from this group are generally low.  Non-developers (whose over-all experience may be as extensive) have reported significantly higher complication rates. While the early literature is conflicting, there is a general consensus that the adoption of these techniques initially results in a greater incidence of complications.

With experience the incidence of complications should decrease; this is the so-called “learning curve” well known to all surgeons learning a new procedure. Whether or not this learning curve is extended or contracted will depend on both individual characteristics of the surgeon as well as features specific to the operation. It is only by accurately monitoring the complication rates over time that a steady state can be recognized. The perceived benefit of these techniques must then be weighed against any change in the nature and/or incidence of complication, which may arise secondary to the adoption of these approaches.

9:09 a.m.

New Techniques Of Intra Articular Surgery
Based On Surgical Dislocation Of The Hip Joint

 

Reinhold Ganz, Martin Beck and Michael Leunig

Conservative hip surgery has lost popularity in the seventies of the last century although some centers have continued to perform osteotomies around the hip. Today, conservative hip surgery can be defined as the surgical treatment of prearthritic deformity and/or of early osteoarthritis of the hip by preserving the biological joint. Hips with established osteoarthritis are not anymore an indication except for situations where alignment is the problem and pain is little. While proximal femoral osteotomies are constantly decreasing in number, some indications remain strong, especially valgus-type osteotomies in post traumatic deformities and non-unions near the hip. Pelvic osteotomies have gained increasing interest during the last 20 years but only the few powerful reorientation procedures have been performed in bigger numbers.

During the last 10 years the impingement concept for the origin of osteoarthritis of the hip has been established. This was possible with a safe technique of surgical dislocation of the hip joint allowing not only new insights into the pathoanatomy but opening a door to a new generation of intra- and juxtacapsular reconstruction procedures. Some of these procedures are already established like the acetabular resection osteoplasty, the debridement and refixation of the labrum as well as the head contouring osteochondroplasty. If the deformity is not too global, the described steps are more and more performed with arthroscopy or with a semi-open procedure. Other techniques are about to emerge from early clinical testing like relative neck lengthening, subcapital reorientation of the slipped epiphysis, femoral neck osteotomy and finally femoral head reduction osteotomy in post Perthes coxa plana.

The different techniques which all depend on precise knowledge of the vascular anatomy are presented.

9:17 a.m.

Femoral and Acetabular Osteotomy

Richard Santore, M.D.

Both femoral and acetabular osteotomies have enduring useful roles in the surgical management of patients with various hip conditions. The original, and ongoing, indication for intertrochanteric valgus osteotomy is to induce healing of femoral neck non-unions by converting the high shear forces of a vertical fracture into compressive forces by repositioning into a more horizontal position. Avascular necrosis of the head, in the absence of segmental collapse and secondary arthritis, is not a contraindication to such a valgus osteotomy (Marti). Additional indications for intertrochanteric osteotomies include post-traumatic deformity, limb length inequality, adult sequellae of Legg-Calve-Perthes (high riding trochanter, shortening and varus), grade II posterior head displacement, apparent varus, and malrotation/impingement due to Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis, and certain cases of osteonecrosis. Isolated intertrochanteric osteotomy is only occasionally indicated for the management of arthritis secondary to dysplasia.

Rotational osteotomy of the pelvis (Bern or Ganz-type periacetabular osteotomy, Tönnis or juxta-articular type or dome type) has overtaken the role once historically played by intertrochanteric osteotomy in the surgical management of dysplasia-related hip anomalies. It is imperative that the hip joint be congruous, free of fixed subluxation and located in the native, not false, acetabulum. Ideal candidates have pre-arthritic, activity related pain associated with radiographic dysplasia. Early arthritic (Tönnis I) is not a contraindication. Surgical management of associated acetabular labral tears/detachments, and impingement lesions can be done at the same time via antecedent hip arthroscopy (same anesthetic) or open arthrotomy. The nature of the dysplasia, i.e. global, or primarily frontal plane, or primarily anterior, needs to be assessed pre-operatively with specially obtained plane radiographs that include a conventional AP, a standing AP pelvis, an AP hip in internal rotation/abduction, a false profile and a lateral. Any associated retroversion has to be assessed. CT scan is often helpful. The directions of the coverage enhancements and their magnitudes need to be customized to fit the nature of the dysplasia. A ‘standard’ method of correction is likely to result in unwanted iatrogenic retroversion is some cases; especially if a pre-existing retroversion has not been taken into account. Intertrochanteric osteotomy is now used as a complement to rotational osteotomy at a rate of approximately one in ten cases, for the indications outlined above. In most cases, the pelvic and intertrochanteric osteotomies are done under the same anesthetic.

All osteotomies should be done with the concept that conversion to total hip replacement might be necessary in the future. Displacements, osteosynthesis and hardware removal should be planned in such a way as to minimize future technical difficulties. Femoral and Chiari osteotomies can pose great difficulty at the time of conversion if major displacement were performed. In the event of iatrogenic severe retroversion after a periacetabular osteotomy, it may be desirable, in fact essential, to perform a reversal of the PAO before the THR, in order to avoid major malposition of the acetabular component that would be the source of untreatable recurrent dislocation.

9:25 a.m.

Hip Arthroscopy

Joseph C. McCarthy, M.D.

Hip arthroscopy is an excellent way to evaluate, diagnose, and treat an evolving number of hip conditions including loose bodies, synovial chondromatosis, post trauma, foreign body removal, and post total hip arthroplasty.  Radiographic studies are not sensitive enough; however, contrast agents used in conjunction with CT and MRI may aid in the diagnosis of intra-articular hip pathology.  Labral tears are the most common cause of mechanical hip symptoms. A review of 1246 cases revealed 98% of all labral tears and 95% of all chondral lesions occur in the anterior quadrant.  The most frequently observed chondral lesion is the watershed lesion, which consists of a labral tear with separation of the labrum from the articular surface at the labral-cartilage junction. The severity of the chondral lesion is highly correlated with the surgical outcome. The lateral approach requires that the patient be positioned in the lateral decubitus position with the affected hip up.  Most intra-articular lesions occur in the anterior quadrant (medial or superior) of the hip and can be treated via two superior paratrochanteric portals.  The paratrochanteric portals pass through fewer muscle planes, avoid potential injury to the adjacent neurovascular structures, and punctures the superior hip capsule which is slightly thinner. A thorough knowledge of positioning and anatomic relationships to portal placement is necessary to prevent potential neurovascular complications from occurring during hip arthroscopy.   Complications are best avoided by sufficient distraction (7-10mm), dedicated hip instruments, and precise surgical skills.  Further improvements in instruments and long-term outcome measurements will define and clarify the role of arthroscopic hip surgery.

9:33 a.m.

Fusion of the Adult Hip

Dennis. W. Burke, M.D.

Despite remarkable advances in the technology of total joint arthroplasty, arthrodesis of the adult hip remains a viable option in selected individuals.

The major indications for hip arthrodesis are unilateral hip disease in adolescents with closed growth plates or in the young adult.  Further requirements are that the patient be motivated and have a full understanding of the scope of the surgery, the details of recuperation and long term function patterns.  Some contraindications to hip fusions are bilateral hip disease, significant back or ipselateral knee disease.  A person with avascular necrosis should have a quiescent interval of 18 months with a negative MRI on the contralateral hip before proceeding with hip fusion.  Reasons which are not contraindications to hip fusions are the female gender, the height stature of a patient or avascular necrosis as a disease entity as long as the contralateral hip has been proved normal by an MRI.

The techniques are many and variable.  The so-called cobra technique is an established and proven technique of high success rate.

One of the essential technical aspects of hip arthrodesis is positioning.  The ideal hip position of the hip fusion is 30 degrees of forward flexion, neutral or slight abduction of the hip and slight external rotation of the hip.  Even a solid arthrodesis will have a poor functional outcome if it is in the wrong position.  Although after a hip arthrodesis the abductors have little function, it is important to preserve their attachment for potential later conversion to a total hip replacement. The “double bean bag” technique of positioning is quite useful and allows accurate reproducible positioning of the hip during the fusion operation.

A cobra plate is used to gain internal fixation.  Male and female bell type reamers are used to conform the acetabulum and femoral head. Be sure to ream the head first. The abductors are preserved by performing a trochanteric osteotomy and reattaching the trochanter over the cobra plate.

Because of the long lever arm of the lower limb, rehabilitation usually consists of crutches for 12 weeks with a 1-½ spica body cast for the first 6 weeks.  Once the arthrodesis has healed the patient may return to full function and have a gait, which will be distinguished by most people, as being near normal.   The patient satisfaction is high.  Long term studies with 35 to 40 year follow up have shown the vast majority of hip arthrodesis patients with excellent pain relief and acceptable function.

9:41 a.m.

Algorithm for Nonarthroplasty Surgery of the Hip

John C. Clohisy, M.D. and Perry L. Schoenecker, M.D.

The management of adolescent and young adult hip disorders has rapidly evolved over the past decade. This is due to enhanced understanding of pre-arthritic and early arthritic hip disease combined with improved diagnostic skills, better patient selection criteria and refinements in alternative surgical techniques. Despite this, there remains a major need to develop optimal diagnostic and treatment algorithms for young patients with compromised hip function. It should be emphasized that comprehensive care of young adult hip patients must employ a diversity of surgical techniques including arthroscopy, osteoplasty, surgical dislocation, pelvic osteotomies, femoral osteotomies, grafting procedures, arthrodesis and prosthetic replacement. Optimal clinical results are dependent upon the combination of careful patient selection and successful execution of the appropriate surgical procedure. The purpose of this presentation is to outline an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of adolescent and young adult patients with symptomatic disorders of the hip.

Detailed history, physical exam and imaging of the hip are essential to develop an optimal surgical strategy for the patient. Initial evaluation must confirm the hip joint as the source of clinical symptoms. A symptomatic hip in the absence of a significant osseous deformity (isolated labral tear, loose body, chondral flap) can be managed effectively with hip arthroscopy. In the presence of an osseous abnormality and a mechanically jeopardized hip, the planned surgical procedure addresses the bony deformity in conjunction with treating the associated intra-articular disease. Such procedures (osteoplasty, debridement and osteotomy) are utilized to treat impingement lesions (reduced head-neck offset, aspherical femoral head, retroverted acetabulum, SCFE) as well as joint overload disorders (classic DDH, Perthes-like deformities). The endstage arthritic hip in the young patient presents a difficult clinical problem that is most commonly treated with prosthetic replacement surgery, yet hip arthrodesis remains an option for the occasional, carefully selected patient. A comprehensive treatment strategy, utilizing a variety of surgical techniques, should provide effective management for the wide spectrum of hip disease encountered in this very challenging patient population.        

10:02 a.m.

Presidential Guest Speaker :

Increasing Sensitivity In The Swedish National Register
Collection of Patient Outcome Data and Cost Utility Analysis

Henrik Malchau, M.D.

Introduction:
The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register was initiated in 1979. The mission of the Register is to improve the outcome of total hip replacement and the hypotheses for the project is that feed back of analysed data stimulates the participating clinics to reflect and improve according to the principle of the good example.

Method:
In addition to revision, used as failure end-point definition in the past, patient based outcome measures are now included. All patients operated with a THR answer a questionnaire preoperatively and after 1, 6 and 10 years. The questionnaire includes Charnley classification, EQ-5D and two Visual Analogue Scales concerning pain and overall satisfaction. Costs (USD 11,000) are obtained from a large central database and by use of the EQ-5D data the cost-utility index, a patient-related measure of cost-effectiveness, can be calculated. Thirty-seven units (of 81) are reporting outcome data.

Results:
The national average for 7-year survival, using revision as failure end-point, has improved from 93.5% (± .15) to 95.8 (±0.15) in two periods observed, 1979-1991 and 1992-2003. The mean gain in EQ-5D index after one year (3 900 patients) is 0.37 implying a cost for 10 years of quality adjusted life years of USD 3000/year.

Conclusions:
The primary reason to document failures and the need for revision surgery is to improve and redefine indications, surgical technique and implant choice. Too high a variation between units reflects autonomy and to follow the principles of evidence-based medicine is necessary in order to standardize around excellence. Register results can provide the information needed in this process and addition of patient based outcome measures further strengthens the potential of a national register.

10:40 a.m.

The Rationale and Results of Metal-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

John M. Cuckler, M.D.

Metal-Metal THR has the longest clinical history of any of the currently used articular couples. Long-term follow-up of what are now considered sub-optimal designs (e.g., McKee Farrar, Ring, Sivash) has produced a wealth of knowledge regarding the safety and efficacy of this articular combination.

Retrieval analysis of metal-metal THR articular couples have demonstrated wear between 1 and 5 microns per year, after initial wear-in, in comparison with 100-­200 microns per year associated with metal-polyethylene wear. Equally important, the histologic response to metal wear debris (which are substantially smaller than polyethylene wear debris) is not associated with a histiocytic response as seen with polyethylene wear, and thus, is rarely associated with osteolysis.

The constituent metal ions released through wear of the metal-metal THR are excreted primarily in the urine, and in general the serum levels have been 3 to 5 times higher than control subjects. However, cobalt and chromium serum levels are also seen in patients who have metal-polyethylene couples in conventional THR or TKR. No adverse physiologic effects have been identified in the long-term follow-up of patients exposed to cobalt-chrome implants.

The clinical results of metal-metal THR's equal or exceed those of conventional articular couples, and are rarely associated with osteolysis in comparison with conventional couples. Additional advantages of the metal-metal combination are the ability to use larger diameter femoral heads for enhanced stability, and the absence of concern over possible fracture of the articular components. The long-term results of metal-metal THR make this materials combination the conservative choice for success.

10:48 a.m.

Avoiding Femoral Fractures in Total Hip Resurfacing

Thomas P. Schmalzried, M.D.

Total hip resurfacing with metal-metal bearing components is considered investigational by the Food and Drug administration.  To date, a total of 147 hips have been implanted by the senior author in 121 patients using the Conserve Plus hybrid hip resurfacing system (cementless socket; cement femur) under an FDA and IRB approved protocol.  This is the initial cohort of patients treated with metal-metal resurfacing by this surgeon.  Eighty-one hips in 70 patients have a minimum of 2 years follow-up, with a maximum follow-up of 50 months.  There have been no femoral fractures.  There was one femoral component that was radiographically loose at 12 months and revised at 17 months post-op.  All other components are in situ.

Careful case selection and minimizing surgical trauma can reduce the occurrence of femoral neck fractures, even in the surgeon’s initial experience.  Pre-operative characteristics of the low-risk proximal femur include favorable shape (head:neck >1.2 and neck length >2cm); good bone density; no cysts >1cm; and favorable mechanics (>120 valgus).  Valgus and anteversion positioning, with anterior/superior translation of the femoral component, minimizes tension stresses on the neck.  Intra-osseous proximal femoral suction keeps the bone dry and promotes consistent cementing.  Aggressive impaction during the insertion of femoral components can be avoided by assuring adequate clearance at the implant-bone interface.

10:56 a.m.

Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene

William J. Maloney, M.D.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene has now been commercially available for approximately five years.  Currently the majority of polyethylene inserts that are implanted in North America are highly cross-linked products.  Clinical data is now available on several of these implants.  Although there are fundamental differences between the commercially available products in terms of manufacturing technique and sterilization, wear testing has been encouraging.  Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that the various highly cross-linked materials have lower wear rates than their conventional counterparts approaching in some cases what was seen in the laboratory.  There have been no reports of rapid wear or premature osteolysis at this time.

Concerns over the mechanical properties are ongoing.  There has been a very small number of liner fracture which appear to be more a factor of the unintended consequences of the use of large femoral heads with unsupported polyethylene and not specifically related to the mechanical properties of the highly cross-linked material.  Finite element studies have shown that in the conditions in which fractures have been clearly documented, conventional polyethylene would have also failed.

11:04 a.m.

Oxinium on Cross-Linked PE

Robert Bourne, M.D., Robert Barrack, M.D.,
Cecil Rorabeck, M.D. and Abraham Salehi, M.D.

Cobalt chrome femoral heads are known to scratch "in vivo".  It has been demonstrated that such femoral head surface damage accelerates polyethylene wear. In this study, a large number of retrieved cobalt chrome, ceramic and oxidized zirconium metal (Oxinium) femoral heads were assessed with up to twenty years follow-up, using six surface roughness parameters and complemented by scanning electron microscopy.

For cobalt chrome femoral heads, surface roughness showed increasing roughness with time "in vivo".  There appeared to be a direct correlation between surface roughness and polyethylene wear.  On the other hand, retrieved ceramic and Oxinium femoral heads demonstrated much less surface damage and less polyethylene wear.

Several wear studies have noted that cross-linked polyethylene is less resistant to a roughened counterface.  It seems reasonable to select the most scratch resistant counterface to articulate against cross-linked polyethylene in patients who are expected to outlive their total hip arthroplasties.  Both ceramic and Oxinium femoral heads seem well suited to this role.  Oxinium femoral heads have all the advantages of ceramic without the risk of fracture.

11:12 a.m.

THA: Alumina-on-Alumina Ceramic Bearings: 3-7 Year Follow-up

James A. D’Antonio, M.D., William N. Capello, M.D., Michael T. Manley, Ph.D.,
Benjamin E. Bierbaum, M.D. and Marybeth Naughton

Introduction:
Alumina ceramic bearings have numerous theoretical advantages.  They are extremely hard and scratch resistant, have a low co-efficient of friction with excellent wear resistance, are more hydrophilic providing improved lubrication, and have no potential for metal ion release.  A US IDE clinical trial (ABC study) began in 1996.  The primary goal of this study was to compare the results of hips implanted with a new improved ceramic-on-ceramic bearing to hips implanted with a metal-on-polyethylene bearing and to compare this performance to prior experiences with ceramic bearings. 

Materials & Methods:
Three hundred twenty-eight hips were implanted in a six surgeon multicenter prospective randomized study.  Two-thirds (222 hips in 207 patients) received ceramic bearings and one-third (106 hips in 104 patients) received the control metal-on-polyethylene bearing.  Polyethylene in the control group was gamma irradiated at 3 megarads in an inert (N2) atmosphere for sterilization.  A second arm of the study (1999-2000) implanted 209 hips (194 patients) with the Trident alumina insert.  This design features a pre-assembled outer metal titanium sleeve for the acetabular insert that increases the strength of the ceramic and protects against intraoperative insertional chipping.  All other implant features were identical to those in the ABC study and the demographics for all study groups were not significantly different. 

Results:
At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years for the ABC study and 3.5 years for the Trident study, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical scores and performance comparing patients who received alumina bearings to those who received the control metal-on-polyethylene.  Revisions for any reason occurred in 2.7% of the ABC ceramic patients and 7.5% of the ABC control polyethylene patients.  Osteolysis was found in 1.0% of hip with ceramic implants and in 18% of the polyethylene controls.  For the ceramic Trident group of patients, revision for any reason has occurred in 1.9% of patients and 0% osteolysis found.  No ceramic fractures or ceramic bearing failures have occurred in the 401 patients receiving 431 alumina ceramic bearings.

Discussion:
The patients in these study groups had a mean age of 52 years and a diagnosis of noninflammatory hip disease.  The results of this study demonstrate that alumina ceramics perform as well as the control metal-on-polyethylene with regard to clinical scores but the ceramic bearing patients had fewer revisions and less osteolysis.  Additionally, we believe our study shows that the issues of component loosening, alumina ceramic fracture and excessive wear have been resolved at least in the mid-term as the result of an improved alumina-on-alumina bearing design coupled with modern cementless implants.  These results lead us to believe that this new alumina ceramic bearing provides a safe option for the younger and more active patient.

11:35 a.m.

Advances In Regional Anesthesia For Hip Surgery

Thomas Parker Vail, M.D.

Surgeons have a strong influence on patient choice in anesthetic type.  Newly developed catheters for continuous medication delivery, specialized infusion pumps, and expertise in the field of Anesthesiology have made regional anesthesia more attractive to patients and surgeons.  Regional anesthesia for major lower extremity reconstruction includes the use of single shot and continuous epidural injection, single shot and continuous spinal injection, continuous lumbar plexus blockade, and continuous peripheral blockade of the femoral and sciatic nerves.  These developments have led to the application of regional anesthetic technique in conjunction with major lower extremity reconstructive procedures such as multi-ligament knee reconstruction, tibial osteotomy, unicompartmental replacement, ankle fusion, and ankle replacement, as well as hip and knee replacement.  Surgeons without experience in the use of regional anesthesia are hesitant to adopt the technique because of perceived inefficiency and prolonged room turnover, while also indicating great satisfaction with the pain relief provided by continuous peripheral nerve blockade.  Recent evidence indicates a high degree of reliability, safety, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction with regional anesthesia.  Widespread adoption of regional technique will require continued demonstration of safety, the possibility of early mobilization with weight-bearing, the early return of proprioceptive function, and system efficiency.

11:42 a.m.

Postoperative Pain Management

Douglas A. Dennis, M.D.

Successful management of perioperative pain is critical for accelerated rehabilitation following total hip arthroplasty (THA).  Perioperative pain management programs must minimize pain without creation of excessive sedation or motor blockade while avoiding treatment complications.  A multimodal program including method of anesthesia and postoperative pain management is necessary to maximize patient recovery.

Numerous methods of anesthesia are available for use in THA including general and various methods of regional anesthesia (spinal, epidural, lumbar plexus blocks, etc.).  Regional anesthesia offers the advantage of continued analgesia postoperatively by use of intrathecal opiods, continuous epidural infusions, or peripheral nerve blocks and has been shown to reduce postoperative pain and the need for parenteral opiods.  Postoperative epidural infusions of either local anesthetics or opiods can be utilized.  Epidural administered Ropivicaine has been shown to lessen motor blockade when compared with Bupivacaine.  Potential complications associated with regional anesthetics include nausea, pruritis, and urinary retention.

Understanding that pain is mediated via neurogenic and inflammatory pathways has resulted in improved analgesia following joint replacement.  Administration of preoperative medications (pre-emptive analgesia) such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opiods which attempt to reduce sensitization of both the inflammatory and neurogenic pain pathways before surgical intervention has been shown to substantially reduce postoperative pain in numerous studies.  COX-2 NSAIDs are frequently chosen due to their reduced risk of interfering with anticoagulation regimens.

Lastly, use of cryotherapy, local wound injection (local anesthetics and opiods), and preoperative education programs are also valuable adjuncts in the treatment of postoperative pain following THA.

11:49 a.m.

Accelerated Rehabilitation for Total Hip Replacement

Richard H. Rothman, M.D., Ph.D.

The current focus of both patients and physicians is on rapid recovery, minimization of post operative pain, and improved function. These goals, although laudable, should never be secondary to excellence in long-term outcomes.

The strategies full in obtaining rapid return to recreational and occupational function include the following:

  1. Surgical considerations include obtaining optimal stability, use of implants that are compatible with full weight bearing, gentle atraumatic surgery, and careful hemostasis.

  2. Improved pain management encompasses minimization of injectable narcotics, oral analgesics, the use of anti-inflammatory drugs, local pain blocks and injections.

  3. Patient selection and education is central. Morbid obesity and habituation to narcotics are contra-indications to a "fast track." Patient education, intensive physical therapy and inculcation of appropriate goals are all utilized.

  4. A team approach is helpful and includes the surgeon, social worker, pain physicians, physical therapist, home-care coordinators, and the family.

  5.  Critical care pathways should be well delineated and explained to families, patients, and the entire patient care team.

11:56 a.m.

Patient Education to Promote Success

Richard D. Coutts, M.D., Thomas R. Turgeon, M.D., Bindesh Shah, M.D. and Mary Elington, R.N.

Preoperative education programs have been used extensively in an effort to improve outcomes following total hip and knee arthroplasty.  Evaluations of length of stay, rate of discharge to home and complication rate were performed on consecutive patients from January to April, 1995 and 1996.  A mandatory multidisciplinary pre-operative education program was instituted in May, 1995.  Mean length of stay was reduced from 5.4 days to 4.7 days for primary hip arthroplasty (p=0.008) and from 5.6 days to 4.5 days for primary knee arthroplasty (p<0.001).  Discharge to home rates did not vary between the groups.  A significant reduction in the complication rate was seen among patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (p=0.03), but not among primary hip arthroplasty (p=0.76).  The institution of a mandatory preoperative education program for total joint arthroplasty was associated with shorter hospital stays for both primary knee and hip arthroplasty as well as a reduced complication rate among total knee arthroplasty patients.

1:30 p.m.

The Otto Aufranc Award:

Bone Augmentation Around And Within Porous Implants
By Local Bisphosphonate Elution

Michael Tanzer, M.D., Dorota Kerabasl, B.Sc., Jan J. Krygier, C.E.T.,
Robert Cohen, M.S. and J. Dennis Bobyn, Ph.D.

The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) was chemically and physically bound to hydroxyapatite coated porous tantalum implants. The ZA elution characteristics in saline were determined as a function of time and the in vivo effects of elution were quantified at 12 weeks in a canine ulnar implant model. Intramedullary implants were surgically implanted bilaterally into the ulnae of a control group of five dogs and a ZA-dosed (0.05 mg ZA) group of four dogs. Computerized image analysis of undecalcified histologic sections was used to quantify the amount of peri-implant bone within the intramedullary canal, the percentage of available pore space filled with new bone, and the number and size of the individual bone islands within the implant pores. The data were analyzed using a hierarchical analysis of variance with 95% confidence intervals. The peri-implant bone occupied a mean of 13.8% of the canal space in controls and 32.2% of the canal space in ZA-dosed dogs, a relative difference of 134% (2.34-fold) that was statistically significant. The mean extent of bone ingrowth was 12.5% for the control implants and 19.8% for the ZA-dosed implants, a relative difference of 58% that was statistically significant. Individual islands of new bone formation with the implant pores were similar in number in both implant groups but 71% larger on average in the ZA-dosed group. This is the first study to demonstrate that local elution of a bisphosphonate can cause substantial bone augmentation both around and within porous orthopaedic implants. The concept represents a potential tool for restoration of bone stock and enhancement of implant fixation in primary and revision cementless joint arthroplasty in the face of compromised or deficient bone.

1:40 p.m.

The John Charnley Award (Award Paper A):

Heritable Thrombophilia And Development Of Thromboembolic Disease
Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Eduardo A. Salvati, M.D., Alejandro González Della Valle, M.D., Geoffrey H. Westrich, M.D.,
Adam J. Rana, B.A., Lawrence M. Specht, M.D., Babette B. Weksler, M.D.,
Ping Wang Ph.D. and Charles J. Glueck, M.D.

We retrospectively assessed whether heritable thrombophilia-hypofibrinolysis was more common in cases developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total hip replacement (THA) than among controls not developing VTE, as an approach to better identify causes of VTE after THA. Twenty cases with proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) following THA documented by magnetic resonance venogram (MRV), and 23 with symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) documented by ventilation/perfusion scan or spiral CT scan, were compared to 43 controls without postoperative VTE, after matching cases to controls by age, gender, body mass index, hip diagnosis, clinical predisposing factors, and VTE prophylaxis.  Measures of thrombophilia included the following gene mutations: G20210A prothrombin, G1691A Factor V Leiden, C677T and A1298C methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), as well as serologic measures of thrombophilia (protein C, antithrombin III, and homocysteine). The hypofibrinolytic 4G/4G polymorphism of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-l (PAI-1) gene was also assessed. Five of 42 cases (12%) and 0 of 43 controls (0%) had antithrombin III deficiency (<75%) (p= .026). Nine of 42 cases (21%) and 2 of 43 controls (4.7%) had protein C deficiency (<70%) (p= .021). Ten of 43 cases, (9 heterozygous, 1 homozygous) (23%) and 1 of 43 controls (heterozygous) (2%) had the prothrombin gene mutation (p= .0037).  VTE cases were more likely than controls to have ≥ 1 abnormality of antithrombin III, protein C, or the prothrombin gene mutation (21/42 [50%] vs 3/43 [7%]) (p<0.0001), with sensitivity 50% and specificity 93% in distinguishing cases from controls. For our 1769 case cohort prevalence of VTE (2%), the predictive value of a positive test (≥ 1 abnormality of antithrombin III, protein C, prothrombin gene) was 12.8% and for a negative test 98.9%. Antithrombin III deficiency had 11.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity in distinguishing cases from controls; the predictive value of a positive test for antithrombin III deficiency was 100% and the predictive value of a negative test was 98.2%. The prothrombin gene mutation had 23.3% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity in distinguishing cases from controls; the predictive value of a positive test was 16.9% and the predictive value of a negative test was 98.4%. Deficiencies of antithrombin III (r= .25, p= .02) and protein C (r= .25, p= .021), and the prothrombin gene mutation (r= .31, p= .003) correlated with postoperative VTE. Having 1 or more abnormality of antithrombin III, protein C, or the prothrombin gene correlated with VTE status, r= 0.48, p < .0001. Cases who had VTE following THA were more likely than matched controls to have heritable thrombophilia with antithrombin III or protein C deficiency, or homo-heterozygosity for the prothrombin gene mutation. Pre-THA screening for these three tests of heritable thrombophilia should improve identification of patients with reduced risk of VTE, who may only need mild thromboprophylaxis, and those with heritable thrombophilia in whom prophylaxis should be more aggressive.

1:45 p.m.

The John Charnley Award (Award Paper B):

Prevention Of Readmission For Venous Thromboembolic Disease
After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Vincent D. Pellegrini, Jr., M.D., Christopher T. Donaldson, M.D., Daniel C. Farber, M.D.,
Erik B. Lehman, M.S. and C. McCollister Evarts, M.D.

Total hip arthroplasty is an operation characterized by a strong predilection for thromboembolic complications with potentially life-threatening consequences. Charnley et al., in a series of 7,959 total hip replacements from 1962 to 1973, identified the overall prevalence of pulmonary embolism to be 7.89 per cent with a fatal outcome in 1.04 per cent. Similarly, in the early 1970's Coventry identified an overall prevalence of pulmonary embolism of 2.2 per cent in a series of 2,012 consecutive total hip arthroplasties; in a subset of patients who received no prophylactic anticoagulation, the prevalence of fatal pulmonary embolism was 3.4 per cent.  Nonetheless, at that time the average duration of operation was 2.4 hours, blood loss was 1,650 milliliters and an average of 1,144 milliliters of blood were transfused. Prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin was started five days after operation and, on average, patients remained at bed rest for one week prior to walking and were discharged three weeks after operation.

During the last three decades substantial advances have been made in the technical aspects of performing total hip arthroplasty, the convalescence from the operation, and our understanding of the pathophysiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism associated with hip replacement. While no less controversial today, the prevalence of fatal pulmonary embolism with contemporary techniques of operation and perioperative management would appear to be on the decline. In the absence of anticoagulant prophylaxis, the rate of fatal pulmonary embolism has been reported to be 0.5 per cent following 1,162 total hip replacements in one study and even less when multi-institution health service databases are accessed from the United Kingdom.  In North America, a combination of warfarin prophylaxis, regional anesthesia and the collective use of predonated autologous blood, expeditious operation, and early mobilization would appear to have lowered the fatal pulmonary embolism rate further to less than 0.1 per cent.

In consideration of this apparent reduction in the prevalence of fatal pulmonary embolism and our heightened awareness of the intense activation of the clotting cascade that occurs during the operation and the 24 hours immediately thereafter, it is not surprising that many investigators have pursued a practice of routine screening for deep venous thrombosis to guide a strategy of selective thromboprophylaxis to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism after discharge following total hip arthroplasty.  The purpose, therefore, of this investigation was to define the natural history of deep venous thrombosis after total hip arthroplasty in an effort to minimize the risk of subsequent readmission for symptomatic thromboembolic events after hospital discharge. Our hypothesis was that a definitive knowledge of the absence of deep venous thrombosis by reliable screening at the time of discharge might allow for a strategy of selective prophylaxis limited to only those with known thrombi or at exceptionally high risk, thereby reducing overall exposure of the postoperative population to anticoagulant agents and their attendant bleeding risk.

1:50 p.m.

The Frank Stinchfield Award:

Muscle Damage After Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed With The
Two-Incision And Mini-Posterior Techniques

Rodrigo Mardones, M.D., Joseph P. Nemanich, M.D., Mark W. Pagnano, M.D.,
Robert T. Trousdale, M.D. and Sunni A. Barnes, Ph.D.

Some surgeons have suggested that a minimally invasive two-incision approach allows total hip arthroplasty (THA) to be done without cutting or damaging any muscle or tendon. To our knowledge that claim has not been supported by any published clinical or basic science data. The purpose of this study was to quantify the extent and location of damage to the abductor and external rotator muscles and tendons after two-incision and mini-posterior THA. Ten cadavers (20 hips) were studied. In each cadaver one side was randomly assigned to the two-incision group and the contralateral hip was assigned to the mini-posterior group. After inserting the total hip components the muscle damage was assessed using a technique described previously. Damage to the muscle of the gluteus medius and gluteus minimus was substantially greater with the two-incision technique than with the mini-posterior technique (p=0.004 and p=0.018, respectively). Every two-­incision total hip had measurable damage to the abductors, the external rotators, or both.  Every mini-posterior hip had the external rotators detached during the exposure and had additional measurable damage to the abductor muscles and tendon. This study does not support the contention that a two-incision total hip is done without cutting muscle or tendon. None of the two incision hips were done without cutting, reaming or damaging the gluteus medius or minimus muscle or external rotators.

2:25 p.m.

Component Removal

Daniel J. Berry, M.D.

Bone sparing, time efficient component removal is an important aspect of revision hip arthroplasty surgery.  In the last decade, a number of complimentary technologies have been developed which together allow quick, safe removal of most failed implants.

Acetabular component removal:
                Cemented cups:  easily removed with hand tools

                Uncemented cups:  well-fixed cups can be cut away from pelvis with little bone

                loss using cup size specific curved osteotomes that self center in cup (Explant system).

Femoral component and cement removal:
                Extended greater trochanteric osteotomy:  Preserves bone and markedly facilitates
                cement removal and removal of well-fixed uncemented stems.

                Ultrasonic instruments:  Facilitate removal of well-fixed cement and removal of
                cement plugs while avoiding canal perforation.

Hand instruments:  Still an important and essential part of cement removal.

Special Power Instruments:  Trephines to remove well-fixed uncemented stems,
                metal cutting instruments and cannulated cement removal instruments all helpful in special circumstances.

The presentation will include discussion of indications for each technique, technical tips associated with each technique, and where available data on safety and efficacy of each technique.

2:33 p.m.

Periprosthetic Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty
A Treatment Algorithm

Harry E. Rubash, M.D.

Periprosthetic bone loss with or without evidence of aseptic loosening is one of the more challenging complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). It occurs with all materials and in all prosthetic systems. Bone loss after THA can be a serious problem in revision surgery because bone deficiencies may limit reconstructive options, increase the difficulty of surgery, and necessitate autogenous or allogenic bone grafting.

When treating patients with osteolysis around a well-functioning total hip replacement, the surgeon must adhere to some basic tenets. The implications of the prognosis must be impressed upon patients, and the importance of close follow-up cannot be overstated. Further, the reasons for the development of the lesions must be explored. The underlying cause of osteolysis is often the generation of particulate debris in and around the joint space. Particle generation is influenced by patient factors, implant considerations, and technical issues. Once the underlying mechanisms have been assessed, a decision for management must be made. Important considerations in determining treatment include: clinical symptoms (rare), the location and progression of the lesion, the degree of bone loss, and the type and fixation of the components (Fig.1). After all available data are reviewed; surgical intervention may be the best and most conservative form of treatment.

Sound surgical judgment suggests that operative intervention should be instituted when femoral structural stability is threatened or when clinical symptoms in the patient are increasing in intensity and are intolerable (Fig. 2).  Loose-cemented femoral stems with osteolysis should be revised.  For cementless femoral components, migration and subsidence are most indicative of a loose stem.  Additional radiographic signs associated with loosening may include femoral hypertrophy, pedestal formation, and expanding radiolucencies.  Loosened cementless stems should also be revised.  Surgery may be indicated for well-fixed femoral stems when there is evidence of progression of osteolysis, and other mitigating factors including the size and location of the lesions, the patient’s activity level, age and medical status. For stems with focal and cavity osteolysis (particularly in Zones 1 and 7), lesions may be grafted at the time of revision of the acetabular component or replacement of the polyethylene liner. Particular attention must be taken when dealing with Zone 4 (tip of stem) lytic lesions. If the stem is also contributing to the particulate debris (for instance extensive shedding of a modular taper or a patch-porous coated stem) it should be revised as well.  

A systematic algorithm is also required for the treatment of acetabular osteolysis (Fig. 3A).  A loose-cemented component must be revised, preferably with an ingrowth type acetabular component.  Pelvic osteolysis, associated with uncemented acetabular components, has been categorized into three separate groups (Fig. 3B).  A stable ingrown acetabular component can usually be retained.  Particulate graft may be placed into the osteolytic defect if it is readily accessible.  In addition, in all instances, the polyethylene liner in modular components should be replaced with a low-wear material (Type I).  Type II components are also stable by virtue of bone ingrowth, but the function of the cup is compromised (malfunctioning locking mechanism, non-modular acetabular component, mal-positioned, etc.).  In these cases, the entire component should be removed, defects filled with graft, and a new component re-implanted.   In some cases a new low wear polyethylene liner can be cemented into the well-fixed shell.  In rare instances the uncemented acetabular component is not stable (Type III).  In these cases the surgeon should always have a high index of suspicion for sepsis.  Type III components nearly always necessitate exchange.

Future clinical and basic research will provide additional considerable insight into the pathophysiology and treatment of periprosthetic osteolysis.  The prospects for eliminating periprosthetic osteolysis remain high as new materials (highly crosslinked polyethylene) are introduced into the marketplace.

Figure 1: Treatment algorithm for patients presenting with osteolysis
excerpted from The Adult Hip, LWW 1998, p. 1550)

Figure 2: Treatment Algorithm for Femoral Osteolysis
(excerpted from ICL Vol 47, p. 323)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3A: Algorithm for Acetabular Osteolysis 
(excerpted from ICL Vol 47, p. 325)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 3B: Algorithm for Acetabular Osteolysis 

(excerpted from ICL Vol 47, p. 325)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References:

  1. Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Paprosky W, Engh CA, Maloney WJ, A new classification system for the management of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Instructional Course Lectures. 1999; 48:37-42.

  2. Sinha RK, Shanbhag A, Maloney WJ, Hasselman CT, Rubash HE. Osteolysis: cause and effect. In: Cannon WD, editor. Instructional Course Lectures.Rosemont IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 1998, 47: 307-20.

  3. Rubash HE. Sinha RK. Maloney WJ. Paprosky WG. Osteolysis: surgical treatment. Instructional Course Lectures. 47:321-9, 1998.

  4. Maloney WJ, Herzwurm P, Paprosky W, Rubash HE, Engh CA: Treatment of pelvic osteolysis associated with a stable acetabular component inserted without cemented as part of a total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1997;79A:1628-34.

  5. Sinha RK, Maloney WJ, Paprosky WG, Rubash, HE: Surgical treatment of osteolysis.  The Adult Hip, ed. JJ Callaghan, AG Rosenberg, HE Rubash. LWW, Philadelphia 1998. Ch. 99. 1549-1554.

2:41 p.m.

Modular Acetabular Solutions

Wayne Paprosky, M.D. and Scott M. Sporer, M.D., M.S.

Background: 
Acetabular fixation in patients requiring revision total hip arthroplasty who have a non-supportive superior dome and proximal migration of the acetabular component (Paprosky Type IIIa defect) or who have a non-supportive anterior and posterior column with proximal/medial migration of the acetabular component (Paprosky Type IIIb defect) can not be achieved reliably with the use of a hemispherical porous coated component alone.  The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term results of the use of a tantalum porous coated hemispherical acetabular component supported with a modular tantalum augment in revision of Type IIIa and Type IIIb defects.

Methods:
Twenty-six patients who had an acetabular reconstruction with the use of a tantalum acetabular component along with a tantalum augment for a Type IIIa or Type IIIb defect between January 2002 and December 2003 were followed annually with clinical and radiographic evaluations. As of the latest follow-up, one patient had died and one person was lost to follow-up.  Therefore, 24 patients with an average age at the time of the index surgery 61 years were evaluated at an average 1.9 years post op (range 1 to 3 years). 16 patients had a type IIIa acetabular defect while 8 patients had a type IIIb acetabular defect. 

Results: 
One acetabular component in a Type IIIa defect required revision due to aseptic loosening.  Radiographically, all of the remaining components except one were stable and showed evidence of bone ingrowth.  Harris hip scores improved from an average of 34 preoperatively, to an average of 94 at latest follow-up.

Conclusions:
Acetabular revision in Type IIIa and Type IIIb defects utilizing tantalum acetabular component along with a tantalum augment show good results at short-term follow-up.

2:49 p.m.

The Weber Technique In Hip Revision Surgery

Karl Zweymüller, M.D.

The exact and complete removal of bone cement from the proximal femur is key for the stable anchorage of any revision stem. The most useful methods are: removal of the bone cement from cranially or wide opening of the femur meta-diaphysis. In contrary we are using a ventrolateral fenestration of the femur diaphysis. For this so-called Weber technique a window of 0.7 to 1.0 mm in width is cut longitudinally in the required length. It is positioned mostly above the distal part of the implant. The cement can be removed using a small drill and chisel. The cortical lid mostly is repositioned using vicryl sutures or titanium cerclage bands. This method can also be applied in cases where a cementless stem cannot be extracted. The advantages of the Weber technique are: the proximal femur end remains intact in the circumference and the femur diaphysis is not weakened to a greater amount because of the fenestration. For this reason, bypassing the fenestration area with the implant is not necessary when using an appropriate revision stem. The duration of operation is decreased compared to a closed intervention from proximally and the cement removal can be performed with more exactness under optical control.

2:57 p.m.

Impaction Grafting: Acetabulum and Femur

Miguel E. Cabanela, M.D.

Impaction grafting for hip arthroplasty revision has now been in use for two decades, both in the acetabulum and the femur.

In the acetabulum impaction grafting has not made inroads in the United States.  While the technique of impaction morselized cancellous allograft has been utilized primarily for cavitary deficiencies, this has been associated with the use of uncemented components and not, as originally described by Slooff et al. with cemented fixation of a polyethylene component. Thus, while morselized cancellous grafting of acetabulae has provided very satisfactory results, it truly does not follow the original Slooff technique. 

For femoral revision, both favorable and less favorable results have been reported with this technique, adapted to the femur from the original acetabular description, first by the Exeter group and popularized by them (Ling, Gie, Timperley).

For the past 12 years, we have reserved the technique of intrafemoral impaction cancellous allograft for patients with primarily cavitary diaphyseal and metaphyseal deficiencies associated with canal geometry or size that would render them less suitable for other femoral revision methods.  We have solved small associated segmental deficiencies with vicryl or Co-Cr mesh or with strut grafts. 

Our experience with the first 10 years of impaction grafting has yielded very satisfactory results when the procedure is performed carefully and the impaction is done vigorously so that a great deal of rotational and axial stability of the cemented component is achieved.  We have always utilized a collarless, polished tapered stems and never a rough surface stem.  Strut allografts have been used liberally for cortical bone defect coverage or simply for reinforcement of weak cortices.

Our only serious complications have been postoperative fractures, which have occurred about 10% of the time.  All fractures, in our experience, have been dealt with by internal fixation of the fracture with plate and strut graft at 90 degrees to each other and all have healed without any subsidence of the prosthesis or subsequent prosthesis revision. Since these fractures most commonly occurred just distal to the prosthetic tip, perhaps the use of long stem prosthesis may have decreased their incidence.

Other complications observed included intraoperative fractures related to bone quality and over-zealous impaction, postoperative dislocation (with a frequency similar than that occurring in other revision procedures), and infrequent nerve complications. 

While we continue to use impaction grafting for femoral revision, its use in our institution has significantly decreased. Reasons for this include the fact that is a time-consuming procedure and similar results can be achieved with faster techniques, and also the possibility of disease transmission due to the fact that multiple donors are required to obtain the large amount of graft usually necessary.

3:05 p.m.

Trochanteric Reattachment

Robert L. Barrack, M.D.

Complications of trochanteric nonunion are significant including limp, weakness, instability, bursitis, and early loosening. In an effort to increase union rate and decrease complications, alternatives to wire fixation including the use of cables have been utilized for over 20 years. Although initially successful, reports emerged of complications relating to the use of cables. In recent years minimizing particulate debris and wear rates have led to markedly diminished enthusiasm for the use of cables based on these early reports of results utilizing early generation cable devices.

The use of trochanteric osteotomy has markedly decreased with the development of alternative surgical approaches. Nevertheless, there are scenarios in which trochanteric reattachment must be undertaken. These are normally challenging revision scenarios such as previous trochanteric nonunion/malunion, or reattachment of a viable trochanteric fragment to structural graft utilized for massive proximal bone loss. These cases are increasingly common and previously reported success rates with wires or early generation cables in these cases have been disappointing.

Cable systems of recent design offer substantial improvements in designs of the cable and fixation devices as well as the instrumentation. The filament diameters and bundle patterns of the cable are much more resistant to both breakage and fretting. New claw geometries offer more rigid fixation with transversely oriented cables that more effectively resist proximal migration. More advanced instrumentation allows gauging of cable tension and the ability to repeatedly tighten and retighten cables sequentially to insure initial optimal opposition, compression, and fixation. Utilizing such a second generation system has resulted in a markedly improved performance compared to wires or early generation cables in challenging cases such as reattachment of the trochanter to a structural graft and previous trochanteric nonunion.

3:13 p.m.

Modular Stems

William Hozack, M.D.

Non-modular fluted tapered revision stems have enjoyed immense popularity in Europe. Wagner introduced his stem in 1987 as a means of treating severe femoral bone deficiencies. The tapered stem was designed to obtain fixation distally in the femoral canal beyond areas of significant bone damage. In cross-section, these stems had a number of titanium flutes projecting from the central stem core. These flutes created immediate rotational stability for the stem within the femoral canal, and ultimately allowed for osseointegration.

Very little is published. Kolstad reported 31 revision hip replacements using the Wagner stem with a mean follow-up of 3 years. A transfemoral osteotomy was employed in all cases, and restoration of proximal bone quality was noted. While the mean subsidence was low, 6 hips (20%) subsided more than 10 mms.  Bohm reported on 129 Wagner stems with a mean follow-up of almost 5 years. Subsidence of the stem was a significant problem: >5mms in 34%, >10mms in 20%.  On the other hand, 88% of stems achieved osseointegration with a survivorship of 93% at 11 years.

In summary, while non-modular fluted stems achieved reasonable clinical results, several problems have been identified: subsidence, lack of modularity leading to difficulty with leg length restoration, and instability related to inadequate offset of the Wagner design.

Modular fluted tapered stems have achieved some degree of popularity in the USA. The philosophy of the modular design is to allow solid impaction of the fluted stem to a position of complete stability, thus minimizing subsidence. Then the surgeon chooses one of several proximal bodies of different lengths (to eliminate leg length discrepancy), placed in optimal version (to maximize joint stability).

Certain technical aspects are very important for success of these tapered modular revision stems.

  1. It is critical to prepare a precise taper within the femur to accept the tapered stem. Inadequate preparation due either to under-reaming or inadequate exposure will compromise the ultimate result.

  2. The transfemoral osteotomy is a key aspect of the overall technique. Using a TFO, preparation of a precise cone within the femur to accept the femoral stem is facilitated. While a precise cone can be prepared without the TFO, it is not so reliably done.  The TFO also simplifies removal of components and cement. The osteotomy may also play a role in the regeneration of proximal bone stock seen with the tapered conical revision stems.
  3. Place a cerclage cable just distal to the osteotomy site. This allows more security with respect to proper preparation of the femoral canal.
  4. After placing the distal stem, use the proximal body trials to adjust for leg length, offset and stability. The proximal bodies should be porous coated to encourage proximal bone ingrowth. This will provide more proximal load sharing and also block the femoral canal from osteolytic debris.

The advantages of a modular tapered revision stem are its versatility for a variety of bone defects, the simplicity of use and instrumentation, the substantial rotational stability achieved, and the significant proximal bone remodeling seen.

Disadvantages include the potential for fracture (newer modular stems are manufactured to higher tolerances) and the problem of subsidence (reduced or eliminated through surgical technique with TFO and cerclage). Newer designs are likely to eliminate concerns about proximal bone ingrowth and long-term osteolysis.

3:35 p.m.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis
After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Jay R. Lieberman, M.D.

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) enhances the quality of life of thousands of patients each year. Unfortunately, these patients are at increased risk for the development of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of symptomatic VTED is between 2% and 5%. All patients undergoing THA require DVT prophylaxis. Despite numerous well-designed clinical trials that have examined the safety and efficacy of prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty the ideal method has not been determined.

The selection of a prophylaxis regimen is a balance between efficacy and the risk of bleeding. The selection of a prophylactic agent may be influenced by the duration of hospital stay, the type of anesthesia used and the pain management regimen. The purpose of this presentation is to review the available prophylactic agents and their efficacy and safety profiles. In addition, areas of controversy including: duration of prophylaxis, timing of prophylaxis screening will be reviewed.

3:42 p.m.

Infected Hip Replacement: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment in 2005

Arlen D. Hanssen, M.D.

Prevention. The disciplined use of aseptic surgical techniques remains critically important and the use of prophylactic antibiotics remains the single most effective method of prevention. The association between surgical skills and the risk of deep periprosthetic infection has been reported in multiple studies. This is particularly important to recognize as new surgical techniques are introduced. Antibiotic-loaded cement has an optimum surface for colonization and prolonged subtherapeutic exposure to antibiotic allows mutational resistance to occur. The unresolved issues both regarding the nature of antimicrobial resistance necessitates further research into the interaction of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and bacteria. Newer strategies of local antibiotic delivery to provide higher and sustained levels of antibiotics include new methods of antibiotic attachment or integration into implanted prostheses. Various strategies to prevent the formation of bacterial biofilms and non-antibiotic modalities such as nanoparticulate silver coatings, which show high effectiveness against multiresistant bacteria, are being actively investigated as additional methods of infection prevention.

Diagnosis. Identifying low-grade infection in failed total hip arthroplasties remains a difficult task. Preoperative aspiration is still an important diagnostic tool and the continued use of standard culture techniques are required to determine antimicrobial susceptibilities of identified organisms. The more invasive tissue drill biopsy offers no advantage over aspiration in terms of bacterial accuracy and results in more false positives. The role of nuclear medicine in diagnosis of the infected joint replacement remains undefined. Histopathological assessment of periprosthetic tissues remains subjective and variable between institutions. Many organisms that are responsible for low-grade infection after total hip replacement are not recognized by routine culture. The increasing use of technologies to enhance a definitive diagnosis such as ultrasonification, polymerase chain reaction detection, and confocal laser immunoflourescence imaging have created the need for a consensus position regarding the actual definition of clinical infection as these technologies are associated with a higher rate of organism retrieval from removed implants. The clinical significance of these findings are yet unknown. The combined use of these diagnostic technologies in real-time is being investigated as an alternative to histopathological assessment. It has been suggested that definitive diagnosis should consider using a microbial or microscopic analysis of the surface of an explanted prosthesis.

Treatment.  Extensive surgical debridement remains the cornerstone for treatment of an infected hip prosthesis. Some of the prognostic variables leading to a higher cure rate with debridement and prosthesis retention are being identified. Staging algorithms based upon patient, wound, and organism variables are being developed to help modify treatment protocols. The utilization of high-dose antibiotic spacers between the time of implant removal and eventual reinsertion of another prosthesis, in a two-stage approach, has become the accepted standard of treatment. The use of direct-exchange techniques has continued to decline globally as patients are now presenting with an increasing incidence of resistant organisms and severe bone loss which increases the difficulty of treatment. In addition to the cure rate of infection now exceeding 90%, strategies to decrease complications such as a persistent limp and high dislocation rates need to be evaluated.

Future Directions.  Biofilms demonstrate poor antibiotic penetration, nutrient limitation and slow growth, and formation of multicellular colonies constituting a multi-layered defense whereby resistance seems to depend on multicellular strategies. Disabling biofilm resistance may enhance the ability of existing antibiotics to clear infections involving biofilms that are refractory to current treatments and recent studies have underlined the potential relevance of biofilm susceptibility testing. Novel techniques such as ultrasound or pulsed electromagnetic fields to augment the efficacy of antibiotics are being investigated. Clearer understanding of biofilms promises to improve the current efforts being directed toward prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.

3:49 p.m.

New Strategies to Prevent & Treat Hip Instability

John J. Callaghan, M.D.

Prevention and treatment of hip dislocation following total hip replacement is a tough problem for the surgeon and patient.  In addition the problem is multifactorial and complex.  Historically one percent of all primary total hip replacements required revision for dislocation and only 60% of those revisions were successful in preventing further dislocation.  Newer understanding of the problem and more varied prosthesis selection should help the surgeon achieve better outcomes in these patients.

Prevention is better than treatment.  Use of trial components, availability of more variety in acetabular liners and femoral offset components, use of femoral neck geometries which optimize impingement free motion, and the development of capsular repairs should and have lowered the prevalence of dislocation.

Just as prevention of dislocation has improved, the potential for better treatments are available today.  In the past, use of options such as replacing the acetabular component with a bipolar replacement were popular.  With the advent of modular components more options are available for treatment.  Especially with the availability of more wear resistant polyethylenes, thinner liners can probably be used safely.  Extended and offset liners, larger femoral heads, and constrained liners are all options to consider in the treatment of dislocation.  If acetabular shells are secure constrained liners can be cemented into the shell.  Better exposure techniques such as extended osteotomy can provide better soft tissue tensioning at the time of closure.  With the use of these newer prosthetic options and exposure techniques, dislocation following revision of a total hip replacement for dislocation should be reduced to less than 10 to 15 percent.

3:56 p.m.

Update On Computer Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty

S. David Stulberg, M. D.

Computer assisted surgery is currently being developed to improve the accuracy and reproducibility with which total hip replacements are performed. It is also anticipated that computer assisted surgery will facilitate the ease and accuracy of various minimally invasive surgical techniques.

The need for increasing the accuracy and reproducibility of placement of total hip components, especially acetabular implants, has been clearly documented in the earliest evaluations of computer-assisted techniques. The usefulness of these techniques in dealing with soft tissue balancing issues, e.g. leg length and femoral offset, has also been described. 

The accurate identification of important anatomic landmarks presents a particular challenge to the development of navigation systems for total hip surgery. Both image-based and image-free computer assisted systems are currently being used to address this issue. As yet, there is not agreement on the most accurate and reproducible method for acquiring the anatomic information necessary for navigation of total hip surgical tools. However, the navigated instruments themselves, e.g. reamers, broaches, are now standardized and relatively user friendly.

The initial experiences with computer assisted total hip systems have confirmed their safety and reliability. Total hip implants, especially cups, can be inserted more reproducibly when navigation is used.  However, the validation of these results is still in progress. At the moment, this technology is still in its developmental stage.

4:03 p.m.

Current Role Of Total Hip Arthroplasty In Acute Fractures

Robert T. Trousdale, M.D.

Arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for the elderly patient with a displaced femoral neck fracture.  Arthroplasty options include hemiarthroplasty with a monopolar or bipolar femoral head or a total hip arthroplasty.  The advantages of hemiarthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty include a shorter operative time and a lower risk of dislocation.  The advantages of a total hip arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty include the potential of less groin pain, less acetabular erosion, and potentially better pain relief and function.  Total hip arthroplasty appears to be a very durable procedure at our center.  The probability of survival of a prosthesis without revision for patients with acute femoral neck fracture was 95% at 5 years, 89% at 15 years, and 84% at 20 years.  At last follow-up (range, 10 to 20.4 years) 86% had no or mild pain.  The overall dislocation rate was 10%. 

Total hip arthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is a durable procedure with minimal pain at final follow-up.  The relatively high dislocation rate may be able to be decreased with meticulous closure techniques and the use of larger femoral head sizes.

4:10 p.m.

Conservative Management of Osteoarthritis of The Hip
 

David S. Hungerford, M.D.

It has usually been considered that 'conservative' meant both non-operative and more or less risk free. Operative treatment was considered 'aggressive' and 'risk-prone'. While patients treated conservatively, might not get better, they at least were not exposed to significant risk. With the withdrawal of Vioxx, due to a nearly doubling of the cardiovascular adverse incident rate compared to placebo and the suspicion also cast on Celebrex and Bexstra, this may need to be reconsidered. With lawyers now trolling for patients who may have suffered an adverse event associated with a COX-2 inhibitor consideration must be given to the liability of the prescribing physician, particularly if the patient has not been informed concerning the risk.

Patients presenting with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip need to be challenged to accept responsibility for their own physical health. Many patients are significantly overweight and under muscled. There is compelling evidence that both weight reduction and exercise can reduce the symptoms of OA of the hip. Further unloading of the hip (by up to 40%) can be accomplished by the use of a cane in the opposite hand. We have an obligation to our patients to both inform our patients of these methods and to encourage their adoption. Use of a cane can be offered as a temporary device while the patient goes about the long-term goal of weight reduction and increased muscle mass.

It is the long-term, use of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) that is associated with complications, gastrointestinal for the COX-I inhibitors, cardiovascular for the COX-II inhibitors, and they should not be used as an alternative to pain control with acetaminophen (Tylenol). There is abundant evidence in the medical literature that both Chondroitin Sulfate or Hydrochloride and Glucosamine either individually or in combination are both effective and safe for both hip and knee OA. Since neither supplement has any analgesic quality, relief is not usually experienced before 4 weeks and often not before 8 weeks, something that is important for the patient to understand. These have become my first line of conservative management for hip OA.

While intra-articular steroid are extensively used for knee OA, it is much less common than the hip because of access. Injection requires fluoroscopic control, preferably in the operating room to reduce the risk of infection. I use it mostly to differentiate between the hip and the lumbar spine as the source of symptoms in patients who have OA in both areas, but some patients have enjoyed many months of significant reduction in symptoms. There is also limited experience with intra-articular hyaluronans in the treatment of hip OA, with positive findings.

The increasing success and longevity of total joint replacement and reduction of risks has made it tempting to advocate early intervention with arthroplasty in patients with hip OA. However., many patients can be successfully managed both non-operatively and 'conservatively', and these measures should be exhausted before the patient is exposed to the real risks of operative intervention.

4:17 p.m.

Update On AVN Treatment
 

Thomas S. Thornhill, M.D.

Reconstructive surgery for the treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head is difficult, as it tends to occur in young active patients with oligoarticular disease.  These patients frequently had normal hips until a specific event occurred and their expectation is to return to normal function.  The reported inferior results of total hip arthroplasty in these patients underscores the importance of seeking non-arthroplasty options.  Choice of the proper option depends upon the stage of the disease at presentation.  Many staging systems have been utilized but the most common are those of Ficat, Steinberg and the ARCO classification.  In this author’s opinion the important defining milestones in staging include the size and location of the lesion, whether it is sclerotic or cystic, the presence of a crescent sign or collapse, an intact lateral column, if there is associated synovitis, the presence of acetabular changes and the progression of the lesion.   Table I. lists the options for treatment of established osteonecrosis of the femoral head.  Choice of option depends upon staging of the disease.

In the past few years investigators have identified newer and more accurate ways to diagnose and classify the disease.  MRI studies comparing diffusion and perfusion scans have been refined.  Attempts to clearly differentiate acute bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) from osteonecrosis and sub-chondral insufficiency fracture (SIF) have been reported.  (Watson, et al Radiol Clin North Am 2004 January; 42 (1); 207-219).  Further studies of the vascularized fibular graft patients at Duke revealed a 5-year survivorship of 64.5% in 188 patients with collapse but no arthrosis.  (Aldridge, Urbaniack, et al, JBJS American 2004, March 86-A Supp. 1: 87-101)

Perhaps the greatest amount of recent activity has been directed towards both stimulation of bone formation and prevention of bone resorption that has been recognized as a hallmark of the pathophysiology of this disorder.  Most of these studies are characterized by small numbers and short follow up.  Rijnen, et al Clin. Orthop. 2003 Dec; (417) 74-83 attempted impaction grafting in 28 hips that were pre-collapse but had an overall failure rate above 50% at mean 42 mos follow-up. Mont et al, (Clin Orthop. 2003 Dec. (417) 84-92) reviewed 19 patients who underwent a femoral window, removal of necrotic bone and grafting with BMP enriched allograft and a thermoplastic carrier.  At 4 years follow up 86% of these patients were deemed clinically successful.  Ganji et al (JBJS 2004 June; 86-A (61153360) reported on the use autologus bone marrow mononuclear cells as a supplement to core decompression in 13 patients with ARCO stage I or stage II disease.  The control group underwent core decompression alone.  At 24 months follow up, 5 of the 8 controls deteriorated to stage III compared to only 1 in the treatment group.  This difference was significant but surprising in that the control group with core decompression alone failed at a much higher rate than has been reported in other series. 

In terms of arthroplasty there have been further data on surface hemiarthroplasty. Adeli and Trusdale (Clin Orthp. 2003 Dec; (417) 93-101), reported 29 femoral head resurfacings for osteonecrosis with an overall survivorship of 75.9% at 3 years but less pain relief than patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.  There has been recent interest in the use of metal on metal resurfacing for osteonecrosis in that it would preserve bone stock, prevent the problems of polyethylene wear and decrease the higher reported incidence of dislocation in this patient group.

Perhaps the most impressive and least reported advancement has been the marked decrease in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the transplant population.  This has been directly related to newer protocols where immunosupression regimens that either greatly reduce or avoid the use of corticosteroids have been implemented.


Table 1.

Options For Treatment of Osteonecrosis

                -Protective Weight Bearing

                -Stimulate Bone Formation
                                -Core Decompression

                                -Vascularized Fibular Graft

                                -Trap Door Procedures
                                                Allograft
                                                Autograft
                                                BMP
                                                Mesenchymal Stem Cells (Bone Marrow Derived)      

                -Inhibit Bone Resorption
                                -Bisphosphonates

                -Osteotomy

                -Hemiarthroplasty
                                Bipolar
                                Surface Hemiarthroplasty

                -Total Hip Arthroplasty
                                Conventional
                                Surface
                                Bearing Surface
                                Metal poly
                                Ceramic
                                Metal on metal

4:24 p.m.

Characteristics of Pelvic Osteolysis on Computed Tomography

Charles A. Engh, Sr., M.D., Nobuto Kitamura, M.D.

This study used computed tomography (CT) to characterize the pattern of osteolysis associated with different total hip arthroplasty (THA) cup designs. CT images were obtained for 126 THAs at a mean follow-up of 10.9 years. We measured the volume of all of periacetabular bone defects using a validated CT software program. Bone defects were defined as osteolysis if they met three criteria: 1) a well-defined sclerotic border, 2) a clear communication between the defect and the joint space, and 3) no radiographic evidence that the defect existed prior to THA. The acetabular components were divided into five different types including: (1) cups with no holes; (2) cups with a single central hole; (3) cups with only a single central hole which had been plugged; (4) cups with multiple central holes; (5) cups with a central hole plus holes in the rim for additional screws. Linear and volumetric polyethylene wear was evaluated on a minimum of three postoperative radiographs using a validated computer-assisted technique. We identified 225 bone defects in 116 of the 126 hips. Of these, 184 lesions in 101 hips fulfilled all three criteria for osteolysis. Osteolysis occurred primarily through the central holes when only those holes existed. Lysis occurred only around the rim when there were no holes in the cup. When cups had both central and rim holes, the lysis occurred through both communication pathways. The lesions that communicated only through central holes and those that had multiple pathways tended to be larger. Among all THAs, there was only a moderate correlation between the total volumetric wear and total osteolysis volume (r=0.418, p<0.001). At a mean of 10.9 years postoperatively, none of the osteolytic lesions were associated with clinical symptoms or had become a source of complications.

In conclusion, communication pathways between lesions and the joint space are valuable for diagnosing osteolysis on CT. Lesion volume, three-dimensional location, and type of communication pathway to the joint can be determined by modern CT. These findings, which differed among cup designs, are useful for better understanding osteolysis and defining the optimal method of treatment.

 

OFFICERS OF THE HIP SOCIETY

President:

Richard White, M.D.

 

First Vice-President:

James D'Antonio, M.D.

 

Second Vice-President:

John Callaghan, M.D.

 

Secretary-Treasurer:

William Maloney, M. D.

 

Member At Large:

Daniel Berry, M.D.

 

Chairman Ed Committee:

Daniel Berry, M. D.

 

Immediate Past President:

Charles Engh, M. D.

 

 

OFFICERS OF THE AAHKS

President:

Richard F. Santore, M.D.

 

1st Vice President:

Joseph C. McCarthy, Jr., M.D.

 

2nd Vice President:

William J. Hozack, M.D.

 

3rd Vice President:

Daniel Berry, M.D.

 

Secretary:

James B. Stiehl, M.D.

 

Treasurer: 

Carlos J. Lavernia, M.D.

 

Immediate Past President:

Clifford W. Colwell, M.D.

 

Members at Large:

Richard L. Wixson, M.D.

J. Wesley Mesko, M.D.

Brian Parsley, M.D.

Thomas Fehring, M.D.

 

 

Educational Committee Chair:

Mary O'Connor, M.D.


The Hip Society Administrative Office:
6300 N. River Road, Suite 727, Rosemont, IL 60018-4226
Telephone: (847) 698-1638 Fax: (847) 823-0536
Email:
hip@aaos.org

[ Home ] [ Goals and Mission ] [Officers ] [ Educational Offerings ]
[ Events and Announcements ] [ Awards ] [ Links ] [ Members Area ]

Copyright © 2010 The Hip Society All rights reserved.