MEETING OF THE HIP SOCIETY
Twenty-Ninth Open Scientific Meeting
The Seventh Combined Open Meeting Hip Society and AAHKS
San Francisco, California
March 3, 2001
PROGRAM CHAIRMEN
John R. Moreland, M.D. and
Douglas A. Dennis, M.D.
CONTENTS:
Program
Abstracts
Hip Society Officers
AAHKS Officers
COURSE DESCRIPTION: This course is divided into five sections. The
first discusses wear and osteolysis. The second presents femoral fixation in
primary surgery followed by the third section, the three Hip Society award
papers. In the fourth section the speakers will communicate different aspects
of the dislocation problem. Our final section introduces different types of
revision surgery.
COURSE OBJECTIVE: The Objective of this Open Meeting of the Hip
Society is to provide the participants with important information concerning
current issues in hip replacement surgery. The Program will convey
information on the important subject of wear and osteolysis. The extent,
biology, treatment, and prevention of wear will be discussed. The continuing
controversy of femoral component fixation will be covered extensively.
Dislocation, a major problem in hip replacement, will be outlined and emphasized.
Finally, prosthesis removal and cement removal, and the current state of
femoral revision will be presented.
INTENDED AUDIENCE: Orthopaedic surgeons and orthopaedic residents.
Program:
8:00 am
OPENING REMARKS
Leo Whiteside, M.D., President of the Hip Society
Richard Welch, M.D., President of AAHKS
SYMPOSIUM I:
WEAR & OSTEOLYSIS
Moderator: Jorge Galante, M.D., Chicago, IL
8:05
am
The Problem
William Harris, M.D., Boston, MA
8:15 am
The Biology
Joshua Jacobs, M.D., Chicago, IL
8:25 am
The Treatment
William Maloney, M.D., St Louis, MO
THE PREVENTION
8:35 am
Metal-on-Metal
Lawrence Dorr, M.D., Los Angeles, CA
8:45 am
Ceramic-on-Ceramic
Laurent Sedel, M.D.,
Paris, France
8:55 am
Ceramic-on-Polyethylene
Michael Wroblewski, M.D., Parbold, Lancashire, UK
9:05 am
Direct Compression Molded Polyethylene
Merrill Ritter, M.D., Mooresville, IN
9:15 am
Cross-Linked Polyethylene
Harry McKellop, PhD, Los Angeles, CA
9:25 am
Discussion
9:35 am
Presidential Guest Speaker
Introduction by Leo Whiteside, M.D.
9:40 am
Femoral Component Fixation
Karl Zweymuller, M.D., Vienna, Austria
10:00 am
Break
SYMPOSIUM II:
FEMORAL FIXATION IN PRIMARY SURGERY
Moderator: Eduardo Salvati, M.D., New York, NY
10:20 am
Cement
Chitranjan Ranawat, M.D., New York, NY
10:30 am
Hydroxyapatite
James D'Antonio, M.D., Moon Township, PA
10:40 am
Tapered Titanium
Robert Bourne, M.D., London, Ontario
10:50 am
Flat Titanium Wedge
Richard Rothman, M.D., Philadelphia, PA
11:00 am
Proximal Porous
Kenneth Krackow, M.D., Buffalo, NY
11:10 am
Composite
Andrew Glassman, M.D., Arlington, VA
11:20 am
Extensive Porous
Charles Engh, M.D.,
Arlington, VA
11:30 am
Proximal Porous/Distal Interlock
Leo Whiteside, M.D., St. Louis, MO
11:40 am
Discussion 12:00 noon
LUNCH
SYMPOSIUM III:
THE HIP SOCIETY AWARDS
Moderator: Robert Barrack, M.D., New Orleans, LA
1:00 pm
The Otto Aufranc Award
1:10 pm
Discussion
1:15 pm
The John Charnley Award
1:25 pm
Discussion
1:30 pm
The Frank Stinchfield Award
1:35 pm
Discussion
SYMPOSIUM IV:
DISLOCATION
Moderator: Kevin Garvin, M.D., Omaha, NE
1:50 pm
The Problem
John Callaghan, M.D., Iowa City, IA
2:00 pm
Posterio-Lateral Approach
Richard White, M.D., Albuquerque, NM
2:10 pm
Anterio-Lateral Approach
Cecil Rorabeck, M.D., London, Ontario
2:20 pm
Component Repositioning
William Capello, M.D., Indianapolis, IN
2:30 pm
Dislocation Treatment
Daniel Berry, M.D., Rochester, MN
2:40 pm
Discussion
2:50 pm
Break
SYMPOSIUM V:
REVISIONS
Moderator: Clive Duncan, M.D., Vancouver, B.C.
3:05 pm
Component and Cement Removal in Revision
Total Hip Arthroplasty
Wayne Paprosky, M.D., Winfield, IL
3:20 pm
Component And Cement Removal: How I Do It
William Hozack, M.D., Philadelphia, PA
3:35 pm
Discussion
FEMORAL REVISION
3:45 pm
Impaction Grafting
Graham Gie, M.D.,
Devon, Ex., U.K.
3:55 pm
Titanium Modular
David Mattingly, M.D., Boston, MA
4:05 pm
Extensive Coating John Moreland, M.D., Los
Angeles, CA
ACETABULAR REVISION
4:15 pm
Cement/Bone Packing
Thom Sloof, M.D., Netherlands
4:25 pm
Cementless
Aaron Rosenberg, M.D., Chicago, IL
4:35 pm
Cages
Michael Christie,
M.D., Nashville, TN
4:45 pm
Discussion
5:00 pm
Adjourn
Abstracts:
8:05 a.m.
Wear And Osteolysis
William H.
Harris, M.D.
The dominant long-term problem with
conventional total hip replacements is periprosthetic osteolysis, caused by
the macrophage and filoblast response to the ingestion of particulate
polyethylene. This cellular response stimulates the osteoclasts, which, in
turn, create the periprosthetic osteolysis (PPO).
While PPO is commonly
recognized as "baloon" lysis in the periacetabular region of the
innominate bone, and as endosteal scolloping in the femoral cortex, other
forms of PPO are also common and important. PPO is the usual cause of
radiolucent zones around acetabular components and contributes to the
radiolucent zones in the femur as well. It also can severely weaken the
lesser and greater trochanter. Thus, this biologic process underlies or
contributes substantially to both femoral and acetabular component loosening
and is a major factor in most femoral and pelvic fractures around total hips.
The
prevalence of PPO can reach 40 to 60% by 10-years.
Thus,
reduction of particulate debris generation is central to the next major
advance in THR.
8:15 a.m.
The Biology Of Osteolysis
J. J. Jacobs, M.D., C. Vermes, M.D., N.J.
Hallab, Ph.D., K. A. Roebuck, Ph.D.,
J. O. Galante, M.D., D.Sc. and T. T. Glant, M.D., Ph.D.
Since
the recognition of aseptic loosening by Charnley in the early 1960s, a large
amount of information has been gained on the basic science of periprosthetic
bone loss. Initially termed "cement disease", it is now generally
accepted that, in most instances, osteolysis is a manifestation of an adverse
cellular response to phagocytosable particulate wear and corrosion debris,
possibly facilitated by local hydrodynamic effects. Tissue explant, animal
and cell culture studies have allowed us to compile an appreciation of the
complexity of cellular interactions and chemical mediators involved in osteolysis.
Cellular participants have been shown to include the macrophage, osteoblast,
fibroblast, and osteoclast. The plethora of chemical mediators that are
responsible for the cellular responses and effects on bone include PGE2,
TNF-α, IL-l, and IL-6. However, a growing number of other
pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, prostenoids and enzymes have been shown
to play important roles in this process. Recent and ongoing work in the field
of signaling pathways have suggested that protein tyrosine kinase pathways
and NF-kB are critical intracellular mediators of this process.
The ultimate goal of this basic research is to develop novel strategies for
the evaluation and management of patients with osteolysis. While initial
animal studies are promising for possible pharmacologic treatment and
prevention of osteolysis, well-controlled human trials are required before
agents such as bisphosphonates can be recommended for general clinical use.
8:25
a.m.
Surgical Management of Osteolysis
William J. Maloney, M.D.
Currently little data exists to guide the surgeon in
the management of periprosthetic osteolysis and stable implants.
However, there are some general principles that can be applied.
Focusing on cementless implants, the first question is whether the
implant is stable and osseointegrated. If the implant is loose, it obviously
must be removed. The principles that have been established for bone
restoration with loose-cemented implants can then be applied. If the implant
is stable and osseointegrated, the surgeon must decide whether to remove a
well-fixed implant or debride and graft around the implant. The key question
to be answered in this process is: Is there sufficient area of
osseointegration with a reliable fixation surface to provide long-term
implant stability? For pelvic osteolysis, a classification system has
been developed to help in surgical management decisions. A type I case is one
in which the socket is stable and the liner exchangeable. In this
situation, the lysis can be debrided and grafted and the liner replaced. A
type II case is one in which the socket is stable, but the liner not
exchangeable and the well-fixed socket must be removed. A type III case is
one in which the socket is unstable and must be removed. We have reviewed our
experience with Type I and Type II cases. Sixty-eight well-fixed cups with
osteolysis in the pelvis and polyethylene wear were identified from a series
of 124 consecutive re-operations for failed cementless sockets. In 40 cases,
(Type I cases), the polyethylene liner was exchanged and the osteolytic
lesions debrided. In 28 cases (Type II cases), the socket was revised. Both
strategies were successful in arresting the process of osteolysis. However,
removal of well-fixed sockets was associated with significantly more bone
loss.
8:35
a.m.
Metal-On-Metal Articulation
Lawrence D. Dorr, M.D.
Introduction.
Metasul® articulation now has 12 years of use with over 125,000 components
implanted and no unusual complications reported worldwide. Recently, Biomet
received approval from the F.D.A. for their metal-on-metal components, which
are a metal shell with a metal taper insert. Currently, metal-on-meta1 is a
routinely used articulation surface both in the United States and
internationally.
In the June 2000 JBJS, Metasul® metal-on-metal articulation for total hip
replacement was reported with a 4-7 year follow-up using monoblock cemented
cups. However, most surgeons use modular inserts into porous coated cups.
Therefore, it is important to determine if modular Metasul® cups have results
as good as monoblock cups and to justify their continued use.
Methods.
The method of this study was a clinical review of 55 hips in 52 patients with
non-cemented porous coated cups and modular Metasul® inserts. Three patients
with three hips were lost to follow-up. Twenty hips had cemented stems and 32
had non-cemented stems. Each patient had an APR porous non-cemented cup with
a modular Metasul® insert which was a polyethylene liner with a 3 mm thick
metal articulation surface machined into the polyethylene. The average
follow-up period was 3.1 years (range 2 to 2.5 years); the average age was
52.7 years (31 to 84 years); 44 patients had osteoarthritis; 5 had avascular
necrosis; 2 CDH, and 1 was post-traumatic. Clinical scores were obtained from
patient self-assessment. Radiographic measurements were fixation of the
socket and stem; osteolysis of pelvis and femur; and penetration (creep) of
the plastic liner in the metal shell.
Results:
Results were that one hip was revised for a disassociated liner. There were
no revisions for loose cup or stem or radiographic loosening so that the
mechanical failure rate for the implants was 0. Forty-four patients grade
their results as excellent, 7 good, 1 fair, and 0 poor. Radiographic results
of fixation showed no cup with progressive radiolucent lines. The initial
penetration (creep or settling) of the polyethylene liner was 0.03 ± 0.04 mm
and subsequent additional penetration at final follow-up was 0.003 mm. There
was no osteolysis of the pelvis or femur. Wear cannot be measured on the
radiographs.
Discussion:
Clinical results at 2-5 years are equivalent to the best-reported results
with cemented or non-cemented total hip replacement with polyethylene and
metal articulation. There was no mechanical failure rate of fixation, no
osteolysis, and less than 0.04 mm of creep of the polyethylene liner which
means that the center of rotation of the femoral head remains in the center
of the cup. Compared to the reports of cemented monoblock cups at 5-7 years,
the results are similar. The monoblock cups had a mechanical failure rate of
1.2% with one loose cup revised and two other cups revised for dislocation.
If one assumed that the perfect total hip replacement would have 90% survival
at 25 years with the patients clinically being 90% excellent or good and the
radiographic linear wear being less than 0.09 mm per year, and no more than
10% significant osteolysis being present, then this review indicates
metal-on-metal articulation deserves further clinical evaluation. With these
modular hips to five years there is a 100% survival rate of components and
98% survival for any reason for reoperation; a 95% excellent and good
clinical results; 0.03 mm creep of the polyethylene; and 0 osteolysis.
Modular Metasul® cups have results as good as any articular surface and as
good as monoblock cups at 2-5 years postoperative. We continued to recommend
Metasul® for all patients less than 75 years of age.
8:45 a.m.
Ceramic-on-Ceramic
Bizot P., Nizard R., Hamadouche M., Hannouche D, Sedel L.
Alumina on alumina bearings
in total hip replacement has been introduced in patients since 30 years.
Excellent tribological properties as well as extra low debris generation
could, in theory, provide an answer to osteolysis. The 24 years experience of
the Paris group show how osteolysis was no longer a problem and revision if
any were related to mechanical failures and not to foreign debris reaction
with the exception of few cases when the prosthesis has been loosened for
many years resulting in metal on ceramic impingement. Cemented socket and
screw in ring metal backed alumina were both bad solutions. Since the
nineties, improvements in alumina quality and in ceramic fixation via
cementless fully coated HA material, provide an answer that could allow
long-term strategy in young and active patients. Preliminary results of the
first 100 hips with cementless stem and socket and 32 mm alumina head,
alumina liner held both via a Morse Taper experienced excellent short-term
results. One socket was revised due to poor initial surgery in a severe
acetabular fracture. High level of excellent results even in this young age
population, from 14 to 71 (median 45 years) are very encouraging.
8:55 a.m.
Alumina Ceramic - Cross Linked Polyethylene
Articulation In The Charnley Low-Friction Arthroplasty
(14-Year Results)
B. M. Wroblewski, M.D., P. D. Siney, M.D., P. A. Fleming, M.D.
A group of 17 patients, 12 men (2 bilateral LFA’s) and
5 women had Charnley low friction arthroplasties with a combination of an
22.225 alumina ceramic femoral head and a cross-linked polyethylene
acetabular cup. Their mean age at LFA was 53 years and 2 months (23 year 7
months to 79 years and 7 months) and their mean weight was 76 kg. (54 to 102)
Four patients died. One patient with multiple sclerosis confined to a
wheelchair was not followed up. The remaining 12 patients (14 alumina
ceramic/XLP LFA’s) now have a follow-up of 14 years and continue to be
followed up. None have had a revision. Their activity is in keeping with
their age and gender. Total mean cup penetration is 0.37 mm mean (0.2 - 0.41)
and a mean penetration rate over the whole period of the follow-up of 0.03
mm/year (0.02 to 0.041) During the first two years the mean total penetration
was 0.22 mm (0 to 0.41) and a mean penetration rate of 0.11 mm/year (0 to
0.22) After the second year mean total penetration was 0.15 mm, (0 to 0.39)
and a mean penetration rate of 0.02 mm/year (0 to 0.05).
Compared with the most recent large series of the
Charnley LFA where the penetration rate in patients under the age of 51 years
was recorded at 0.11 mm/year, the ceramic XLP combination offers a fivefold
reduction in the penetration rate. Whether or not polyethylene wear particles
play a part in component loosening remain to be addressed. There is little
doubt that reducing wear rates by the use of ceramic polyethylene combination
is the next stage of evolution of the Charnley LFA.
9:05 a.m.
Direct Compression Molding
Merrill A. Ritter, M.D.
Direct compression molded polyethylene is a process of
creating a net shaped component with finished articular surfaces from ultra
high molecular weight polyethylene by applying heat and pressure to the raw
resin Hi-fax 1900 with the use of fixed geometry metallic tools. The final
product has no machining or finishing. Between 1974 and 1978 there were 378
T-28 stems and 171 TR-28 stems articulating with a cemented direct
compression molded acetabular component. Linear wear was 0.06 mm per year for
the T-28 stem and 0.05 mm for the TR-28 stems. The revision rates for the
acetabulum were 9.5% and 7.9% respectively with two acetabula noting
osteolysis. On the femoral side they were 11.1% and 12.8% with 11 and 1 cases
of osteolysis respectively. Between 1983 and 1996 4,581 AGC cemented total
knee replacements with direct compression molded non-modular tibial components
were performed. There was no osteolysis in the non-modular compression molded
total knee replacements with 0.1% failure of the femoral components and 0.4%
failure of the tibial components. Failure of all of these implants was
because of cement technique and/or instability, wear and osteolysis were
minimal.
Direct compression molded polyethylene has stood the
test of time and is an answer for the polyethylene of the present day.
9:15 a.m.
Polyethylenes with Elevated Crosslinking
Harry A. McKellop, Ph.D.
The
vast majority of the millions of UHMW polyethylene components that were used
in hip and knee prostheses over the past three decades were sterilized using
2.5 to 4 Mrads of gamma radiation, with the implant packaged in air during
sterilization and, in some cases, during several years or more of shelf
storage prior to clinical use. Clinical follow-ups involving thousands of
these gamma-sterilized implants, and retrieval analysis of hundreds in
numerous centers internationally, has established that gamma-sterilization
had both good and bad effects on the polyethylene. One important benefit was
that the moderate level of crosslinking that was induced by the gamma
radiation had the potential to improve the wear resistance of the
polyethylene. However, oxygen that had diffused into the outermost 1 to 3 mm
of the component prior to irradiation caused immediate oxidation during
irradiation and, therefore, reduced crosslinking in the surface layer.
Unfortunately, it was this surface layer that was subjected to wear in the
patient. In addition, residual free radicals produced by the irradiation
caused additional long-term oxidative degradation of the polyethylene as
oxygen diffused into the implant during shelf storage and/or in vivo. In
extreme cases, this led to gross delamination and fracture of the components.
Over
the past few years, four types of new UHMW polyethylenes with elevated levels
of crosslinking received FDA approval and were introduced commercially, and
others are undergoing development or approval. The common goals of these new
processing techniques is to take advantage of the ability of crosslinking to
improve wear resistance, while avoiding oxidative degradation. However, the
four materials already in commercial use differ in the type of radiation used
to induce the crosslinking, in the amount of crosslinking used, and in
whether or not the bulk crosslinked polyethylene is remelted after
irradiation but prior to machining into a component, in order to extinguish
the free radicals and provide maximum resistance to long-term oxidation.
Two
of the four new polyethylenes are crosslinked with gamma radiation, as used
in the past for routine sterilization. The other two are crosslinked with
electron-beam radiation, a technique that is new to orthopaedic implants.
Among other potential differences, an electron beam transmits the
crosslinking energy into the polyethylene thousands of times faster than with
gamma radiation, resulting in considerable heating of the polymer. Although
there are laboratory data indicating that crosslinking the polyethylene while
it is heated may have positive effects, whether this leads to an advantage or
disadvantage in the clinical performance has yet to be determined.
Interestingly, the
laboratories that developed the new processes are in close agreement
regarding the percent reduction in wear rate conferred by a given
crosslinking dose (whether induced by gamma or electron beam). Advocates of
limiting the crosslinking dose to 5 Mrads (i.e., about 25% higher than the 4
Mrads maximum used historically for radiation sterilization) maintain that a
careful review of the literature summarizing the past clinical performance of
gamma-air sterilized implants strongly indicates that the 85% to 90%
improvement achieved with a 5 Mrad dose will be sufficient to reduce the wear
rate well below the biological threshold for osteolysis, even in the most
active patients. In contrast, advocates of increasing the dose to 10 Mrads
(about 2 ½ times the historical maximum) maintain that the additional 5% to
10% reduction in wear offsets any potential drawbacks of this high level of
crosslinking, such as lower fracture resistance.
With each of the four new
crosslinking processes, the polyethylene is irradiated while still in bulk
form, such that any oxidized surface layer can be removed when the implant is
machined from the central portion of the block or bar, thereby avoiding one
of the serious problems of gamma-air sterilization of finished components. In
addition, with three of the new polyethylenes, the block or bar is remelted
prior to machining, in order to extinguish the free radicals caused by the
irradiation. By definition, when UHMW polyethylene is heated above its “melt”
temperature (about 155º C), it is transformed from a partially crystalline
solid to a completely amorphous solid. This liberates the free radicals
(electrons) that are trapped in the crystalline regions, allowing them to
neutralize each other, thereby minimizing the potential for long-term
oxidative degradation. In contrast, the fourth polyethylene is annealed
(i.e., heated below the melt temperature) after irradiation. Since the
crystalline regions are not completely transformed, depending on the
temperature and duration used, many free radicals may remain in the
polyethylene after annealing. Nevertheless, the advocates of annealing
maintain that, because the finished implants are stored in nitrogen, and
because the concentration of oxygen in the joint fluids is much lower than in
air, any oxidation of the residual free radicals that does occur on the shelf
or in vivo will have negligible effect on the long-term performance of the
implants. On the other hand, they maintain that the changes in the mechanical
and morphological properties of the UHMW polyethylene are smaller with annealing
than with remelting and, therefore, annealing represents a more conservative
approach.
In response, the advocates of
remelting point out that the UHMW polyethylene used by all of the
manufacturers was melted at 170 ºC or higher when the original powder was
formed into a molded block or extruded bar. Furthermore, since industrial
UHMW polyethylene is not optimized specifically for the orthopaedic market,
the subtle changes in mechanical and/or morphological properties caused by
remelting (for example, a slightly lower stiffness) are, if anything, as
likely to enhance the long-term performance of a prosthetic joint as they are
to degrade it. Finally, they maintain that, if the free radicals that remain
after annealing do oxidize substantially in vivo, the resultant degradation
of the wear resistance and other mechanical properties of the implant could
far outweigh any negative effects of remelting.
Thousands of implants with
elevated levels of crosslinking are being implanted each month
internationally, and the respective manufacturers have instituted
multi-center, detailed clinical monitoring. Ideally, this will permit early
detection of any unanticipated problems and, eventually, demonstrate
quantitatively whether or not either of the new polyethylenes constitutes a
substantial improvement over alternative bearing materials, including
polyethylene that has been crosslinked during routine gamma-sterilization in
low-oxygen packaging, as well as metal-metal and ceramic-ceramic hips.
9:40 a.m.
Evolution and Results of Conical Straight Titanium
Stems with Corundum Blasted Surfaces.
Felix Lintner, M.D., G. Böhm, M.D., Ch. Lhotka, M.D., and K. Zweymüller,
M.D.
Since 1979, the authors have
been using a conical rectangular-cross-section titanium stem, for cementless
fixation. This device allows stable fixation, at primary arthroplasty, in all
but a few extreme cases. Even elderly patients with marked osteoporosis can
be successfully managed, as can patients with an extremely high or an
extremely low canal flare index. The first-generation stems (1979–1986) had
little surface roughness (mean: 1 micrometer); the second (post-1986)
generation stems have a mean roughness of 5 micrometers. A histologic and
morphometric analysis of 34 stably fixed stems (time in situ: ten days to
15.2 years) was performed, to study the host bone response. The same
osseointegration patterns were seen at the two degrees of surface roughness.
Morphometry showed a mean osseous implant coverage of between 49% and 71%. In
the immediate postoperative period, the mean implant/bone contact area was
only 10%, which is adequate for stable primary fixation. At one year, new
bone formation had increased up to threefold, from the postoperative values.
Second-generation stems have been given an additional sagittal-plane taper,
without changing the fixation principle. Morphometry showed a more uniform
distribution of bone coverage along these stems. The study confirmed the
primary and long-term stability of corundum-blasted conical straight-stem
devices, by biologic fixation in the sense of osseointegration.
10:20 a.m.
Cemented Femoral Stem In Total Hip Arthroplasty
C.S. Ranawat, M.D., V.J.
Rasquinha, M.D.
The fixation of the femoral stem is reproducible and
provides excellent early recovery of hip function in patients 60 - 80 years
of age. The durability of fixation has been evaluated up to 20 years with 90%
survivorship. The reported clinical failure rate of cemented femoral stem
fixation is < 5% at 10-15 years follow-up with second-generation cement
technique1,2. However in younger patients (<50 years) the
reported failure rates range from 2.1% to 14% at 15-year follow-up3.
The radiographic failure rate using cement debonding, progressive, global
radiolucency, cement mantle fracture and migration of 3 mm as criteria is 8%
at 15 years2,3. The durability of cemented total hip arthroplasty
is multifactorial and good cement techniques and reduction in polyethylene is
of premier importance. The primary reason for early aseptic loosening, i.e.
within 10 years, is failure to achieve good micro and macro interlock at the
time of surgery. Later failure involves both mechanical and biological
factors as a consequence of an histlocytic response to the wear debris.
The importance of an even cement mantle >2 mm
thick is critical to ensure optimal stress transfer. Meticulous cement
techniques are necessary to achieve a rigid fixation of the implant of
suitable geometry to the bone and consequently improved clinical and
radiographic results. They include the use of hypotensive epidural
anaesthesia, adequate exposure via the posterior approach, preparation of the
femoral bed with preservation of stable cancellous bone, pulsatile lavage and
drying of the cancellous bone, mixing and pressurization of the cement into
the plugged femoral canal and proper insertion/centralization of the femoral
component. Undoubtedly the short and long term results of femoral components
in total hip arthroplasty are influenced by a host of factors that include
patient factors, design features, materials, evaluation criteria and duration
of follow-up. However technical factors have a major bearing on the
short-term and subsequent long-term results of the cemented femoral
component. Since 1991, our experience in 235 cemented THA’s with the direct
compression molded all polyethylene socket has demonstrated clinical
survivorship of 99% and a mean wear rate of 0.075 mm/yr at a mean follow-up
of 8 years.
The debate of the role of surface finish and the
mechanism of cement fixation of femoral stems continues to be ongoing.
Current knowledge has confirmed comparable excellent outcomes with femoral
stems that are polished and with a surface roughness Ra=45 microinches. We
recommend the use of the cemented femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty as
the implant/technique of choice for patients who are 60 years old or older.
REFERENCES:
- Ranawat,
C.S., Deshmukh, R.G., Peters, L.E., Umlas, M.E.: Prediction of the long-term
durability of all-polyethylene cemented sockets. Clin. Orthop 1995:
317:89-105.
- Mulroy,
W.F., Estok, D.M., Harris, W.H.: Total hip arthroplasty with use of
so-called second generation cementing techniques. A fifteen year-average
follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg 1995: 77A: 1845-1852.
- Callaghan, J.J., Forest, B.E., Olejniczak,
J.P., Goetz, D.D., Johnston, R.C.: Charnley total hip arthroplasty in
patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg 80A:
704-714, 1998.
10:30 a.m.
HA Coated
Femoral Stems: 13 Year Follow-Up
James A. D'Antonio, M.D., William N. Capello, M.D.,
Michael T. Manley, Ph.D.
Hydroxylapatite (HA) coatings are osteoconductive
and increase the amount, speed and strength of bony attachment compared to
uncoated implants of the same design. HA coated stems have been shown to have
less micromotion and subsidence than porous coated and cemented stems.
Concerns with regards to HA delamination and third body wear have not
materialized with thin dense plasma sprayed coatings.
In a multicenter study 380 HA coated femoral stems
were implanted in a young and active patient population from 1987 through
1990. 268 patients (305 femoral stems) have a minimum 10-year and maximum
13-year follow-up. The average age of the patients was a young 51 years, 55%
of patients were males, 66% had a diagnosis of OA and 16% had avascular AVN.
Clinically these patients manifested early pain relief and rapid restoration
of function. The HHS at last follow-up have averaged 91.5 and 3% of patients
complain of activity-related mild to moderate thigh pain. Radiographic
analysis shows progressive bone remodeling around these implants through
post-op year five, 100% of the stems are bony stable, 40% show proximal zone
erosive lesions at the femoral neck resection level, and no patient has
distal osteolysis. Two patients have been revised for aseptic loosening; one
at two years in a patient who had a subtrochanteric osteotomy that never
united and the implant was never stable; one aseptic loosening occurred at
9.5 years. No patient has a radiographically unstable stem. Two high-risk
groups of patients include 116 patients under the age of 50 (average age 38),
and 48 patients with AVN (average age 42 years). The mechanical failure rate
(MFR) in these two subgroups are 1.8% for the patients under 50 and 0.0% for
the patients with AVN.
These results demonstrate excellent lasting fixation
to a grit blasted tapered titanium stem with a dense highly crystalline pure
proximal HA coating. This stem has performed well in a young and active
patient population and in the hands of a variety of orthopaedic surgeons.
10:40 a.m.
Tapered
Titanium Cementless Total Hip Replacement:
A Ten to Thirteen Year Follow-up Study
Robert B. Bourne, M.D., FRCSC, Cecil H. Rorabeck,
M.D., FRCSC,
James I. Patterson, M.D., Jeff Guerin, Hons. BMath
The 10 - 13 year performance of 307 Mallory Head,
cementless, tapered total hip replacements in 283 patients was assessed.
Ninety percent of patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Fifty-five
percent of patients were female. Mean patient age was 64 ± 10 years. The
Hex-Loc acetabular component was used in each patient, as well as titanium
alloy femoral heads.
At final follow-up, 37 (13%) patients had died, 32
(10%) had undergone a revision and 2 (1 %) were lost to follow-up. No femoral
stem was revised for aseptic loosening, but one was revised for sepsis and
one for a periprosthetic fracture. Wear, osteolysis and loosening were
problems with the Hex-Loc acetabular components and 32 (10%) acetabular components
required revision. The mean Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 87 ± 14.
Thigh pain was noted in 3% of patients. Radiographic assessment revealed that
no femoral stem or acetabular socket was definitely or probably loose. Three
dimensional wear assessment using the Devane technique was 0.35 mm/year.
The Mallory Head cementless, tapered femoral
component performed well in this study, but unfortunately, the clinical
results were compromised by the use of a poorly designed acetabular
component, gamma irradiated polyethylene in air and titanium alloy femoral
heads.
10:50 a.m.
Total Hip
Arthroplasty with a Collarless Wedge-Fit Tapered Cementless Stem
Richard Rothman, M.D., J.J. Purtill, M.D., W.
Hozack, M.D., P. Sharkey, M.D.
The authors report 15-year experience with total hip
arthroplasty using a collarless wedge-fit tapered circumferentially porous
coated femoral stem (Trilock, Dupuy, Warsaw, In and Taperlock, Biomet, Warsaw
IN).
Excellent clinical results (Charnley pain function
and motion scores improved from 3, 2.7 an 3.2 to 5.7, 5.5 and 5.2
respectively and Harris hip score of 91 at 15 years), low rates of thigh pain
(1.4% and 4% for the Trilock and Taperlock respectively) combined with low
rate of mechanical failure ( 5% for the Trilock and 0% for the Taperlock)
were achieved with these implants Successful THA was performed in subsets of
the population traditionally thought to have poor bone stock (over 80 years
old and rheumatoid arthritis).
Initial stability of these implants was confirmed
with an Instron machine and fresh frozen cadaveric femora. Excellent
stability was noted with similar plastic deformation and micromotion to
cemented femoral implants. Clinically, immediate postoperative weight bearing
is well tolerated with minimal subsidence (mean 0.86 mm) and no directly
attributable failures.
Hydroxyapatite coating appears to provide no
clinical or radiological advantage at 2-year mean follow-up with Charnley
pain, range of motion and function scores of 5.6, 5.6 and 5.6 with
hydroxyapatite and 5.6, 5.6, 5.6 without, respectively. Visual analog pain
scores however showed less thigh pain at 3 and 6-month evaluations in the
hydroxyapatite augmented stems.
Design features (collarless tapered wedge-fit
circumferentially porous coated) are thought to be responsible for the
excellent results.
11:00 a.m.
Proximal
Porous Coating
Kenneth A. Krackow, M.D.
The rationale and evolution of proximal porous
coating and porous coating in general have to be understood in the context of
total hip arthroplasty circa 1978-80. The claims of 98% or even 90%, 10 to
15+ year survival of cemented implants were not being made, both because
there was a paucity of results over that time period, and at least USA
surgeons felt they were seeing enough short to intermediate term failure,
especially in younger people, that an alternative fixation mechanism was
warranted.
Animal laboratory work extending from an initial
observation about screw stability in bone suggested that bone ingrowth into
either porous beaded surfaces or fiber metal mesh surfaces may provide a very
predictable, sturdy fixation methodology. Choice of metal, porous structure,
and extent of porous coating were all considered by a variety of scientists
and manufacturers.
From the outset there was concern about observations
of very strong bony attachment to pegs and rods that were porous coated,
feeling that distal coating in the proximal femur could lead to proximal
stress shielding. There were then laboratory studies raising this concern,
and it is the opinion of many of us that today there are abundant clinical
examples corroborating this concern.
As a result, some, actually most, of the first
“modern” attempts at porous femoral fixation (PCA’s and proximally coated
AML’s) restricted the porous coatings to the proximal 25 to 40% of the
femoral component surface. In addition to the concern about proximal stress
shielding secondary to rigid distal fixation, some saw the broader, obviously
vascular, proximal cancellous bone as an attractive bed from which ingrowth would
sprout.
It is safe to say that the initial experience from
1982-3 out to 1985-7 revealed satisfactory but less than optimal 3 to 5 year
results with a slightly higher failure rate for component revision in many
surgeon’s hands and the development of a situation, disputed by some surgeons
but not by their patients, affectionately referred to then and now as thigh pain. Beyond that early
experience we also began to recognize more consistently osteolysis and look for explanations and solutions to it also.
The AML group led by Charles Engh pursued the course
of increasing the extent of porous coating, while others addressed stem
geometry, changes to more flexible metals and stem designs, also HA
coatings---still with adherence to the goal of avoiding proximal stress
shielding.
There is more to the concern about extensively
coated stems than proximal stress shielding, and that is the recognized
difficulty of stem extraction or bail-out in the event of infection,
fracture, recurrent instability associated with component malposition, etc.
As a result many of us have held steadfast to the use of the proximally
coated stems and today feel increasingly confident in their use.
As we review intermediate and now long-term results
one can extract any conclusion that he/she desires, and we get down to a
choice that is akin to issues of religion and politics. Our task today cannot
be to convince someone, one way or the other but to explain the issues and
allow therefore a choice which addresses those points an individual surgeon
feels are most important for his/her patient.
11:10 a.m.
A Low
Stiffness Composite Biologically Fixed Prosthesis
Andrew H. Glassman, M.S., M.D., Roy D. Crowninshield,
Ph.D.,
Peter Herberts, M.D., Russell Schenck, Ph.D.
A novel total hip femoral component was designed to
simultaneously achieve stable skeletal fixation, structural durability, and
reduced femoral stress shielding. The prosthesis combines a thin, forged,
cobalt chrome core, surrounded by a polyaryletherketone material that is
molded between the core and an extensive porous bone ingrowth surface
comprised of titanium metal fibers. The resultant construct allows for
proximal and distal canal filling, yet is significantly less rigid than
all-metallic femoral stems crafted of either cobalt chrome or titanium alloy.
Canine studies revealed favorable biological fixation and stability. Clinical
experience is now approaching six years of duration, with a cohort of 366
patients (386 hips) treated at 21 institutions under a structured,
multicenter clinical evaluation protocol. To date, complications have been
unremarkable, and no femoral implants have required revision. Clinically,
patients have shown excellent return to function, and exhibit very high
Harris hip scores at each annual evaluation beyond one year postoperatively.
Low levels of hip and thigh pain characterize the clinical outcome.
Radiographically, the implants appear well fixed and exhibit no progressive
radiolucencies or osteolysis. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies on one
subset of patients showed strong initial fixation and minimal stem
micromotion in direct comparison to other metallic porous and cemented
control implants. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) analysis on another
subset of patients revealed excellent periprosthetic bone mineral density
retention, with significant reduction in stress shielding as compared to
literature reports on other fully porous coated, all-metallic implants.
Additional clinical and radiographic follow-up of this novel prosthesis is
planned, in hopes that the long-term biological response to a low-stiffness
hip implant may become better understood and appreciated.
11:20 a.m.
Long-Term
Results of Primary Total Hip Arthoplasty Using the
Anatomic Medullary Locking Prosthesis
C. Anderson Engh, Jr., M.D., Alexandra M. Claus,
M.D., Ph.D.,
Robert H. Hopper, Ph.D., Charles A. Engh, M.D.
This review reports long-term outcomes of 223
consecutive nonselected cementless primary total hip arthroplasties using
extensively (>50%) porous-coated nonmodular AML stems and Trispike
acetabular components. The arthroplasties were performed from October of 1982
through December of 1984. Mean patient age was 55. Eleven patients (12 hips)
did not have minimum 2-year follow-up, leaving 204 patients (211 hips) with a
mean follow-up of 13.4 years and a radiographic follow-up of 12.1 years.
Thirty-nine patients (39 hips) had primary component revisions. One complete
revision was performed for infection. Three stems were revised for aseptic
loosening. Eighteen acetabular shells were revised: 7 for loosening, 4 for
osteolysis, 3 for wear, 3 for recurrent dislocation, and 1 for sepsis.
Seventeen polyethylene liners were exchanged: 9 for wear, 6 for osteolysis,
and 2 for recurrent dislocation. Five rerevisions were performed. Accounting
for revisions for loosening and the stability of the remaining components,
the loosening rate was 3.4% for femoral components and 4.9% for acetabular components.
In summary, porous coated fixation with the AML stem and Trispike acetabular
component is durable. The most common reasons for reoperation are
polyethylene wear and osteolysis. Factors contributing to wear-related
acetabular revisions included younger patient age, the use of nonmodular
32-mm femoral heads, and proactive polyethylene liner exchanges to avoid
wear-through.
11:30 a.m.
Fixation
of the Femoral Component in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Leo A. Whiteside, M.D. and Daniel S. McCarthy
This study was designed to test the hypothesis that
press-fit femoral components with proximal press-fit and distal mechanical
interlock can achieve fixation sufficient to allow bone ingrowth in
osteoporotic as well as in normal bone. Addition of steps along the tapered
distal stem improved fixation in osteoporotic bone enough to reduce
micromotion to less than 20 microns in response to physiologic axial and
torsional load. The clinical portion of the study included 226 consecutive
hips (223 patients) with two-to-four year clinical results after total hip
arthroplasty with a rectangular femoral component using proximal porous
coating and distal mechanical interlock. Patient age ranged from 36 to 92
years. At two years postoperative, four percent of the femurs with type A
(normal) bone, three percent with type B (intermediate) bone, and none with
type C (osteoporotic) bone had thigh pain. No clinical cases of loosening
have occurred either in normal or osteoporotic femurs.
1:00 p.m.
The
Otto Aufranc Award:
The Role of Labral Lesions in the Development of
Early Degenerative Hip Disease
Joseph C. McCarthy, M.D., Philip C. Noble, Ph.D.,
Michael R. Schuck, M.D.,
John Wright, M.D. and Joanne Lee, R.N.
It is well recognized that the etiology of
osteoarthritis of the hip is multifactorial, with significant contributions
from genetic, structural, biochemical and morphologic factors. Moreover,
previous attempts to classify degenerative hip disease as either idiopathic
or secondary have failed to explain the underlying cause of many cases of hip
pathology, despite sensitive and exacting measures of normal skeletal
morphology and intraarticular pressures. These observations have led us to
suspect that, in many cases of so-called “idiopathic” degeneration,
predisposing factors may have been present that are not readily appreciated
using conventional diagnostic and radiographic modalities. Previous authors
have postulated that the high incidence or early arthritis observed in
dysplastic hips is due to the instability of the articulation und the
repetitive shearing of the articular surface with functional joint motion.
This suggests that other disturbances of the soft-tissue structures
stabilizing the hip may also precipitate degenerative changes due to
compromised joint stability. Potentially, one such condition is mechanical
disruption of the hip labrum.
Although lesions of the acetabular labrum were once
considered a rarity, the prevalence of labral pathology has become more
evident with the refinement and increased utilization of hip arthroscopy.
However, the natural history of labral lesions has yet to be well defined
and the functiona1 significance of the nom1allabrum remains a subject of
debate. Moreover, though some authorities have suggested that acetabular
labral pathology could conceivably contribute to the development of hip
osteoarthritis, this hypothesis has yet to be adequately investigated.
This study was conducted in three stages to examine
the hypothesis that labral lesions contribute to early degenerative hip
disease and to determine the feasibility of measures to prevent joint
pathology through treatment of labral injuries. The goal of the first stage
was to define the relationship between articular degeneration and labral
lesions in patients whose joint symptoms were suggestive of labral pathology.
The second stage was to determine whether similar correlations exist in
individuals without symptoms without a documented history of joint disease.
The third stage was to determine whether the hip labrum has a vascular supply
that might potentiate the repair and regeneration of labral lesions, thereby
preventing articular degeneration.
1:15 p.m.
The
John Charnley Award:
3-D Analysis of the Cement Mantle in THA
Gonza1o G. Valdivia, M.D., FRCSC, Michael J. Dunbar,
M.D., FRCSC, David A. Parker, M.D.,
Michael R. Woolfrey, M.D., FRCSC, Richard W. McCalden, M.D., FRCSC,
Cecil H. Rorabeck, M.D., FRCSC, Robert B. Bourne, M.D., FRCSC
Quality of the cement mantle around the femoral stem
is often quoted as a critical factor in the success of cemented total hip
arthroplasty. Concern has been raised about the reliability of plain
radiographs for its assessment. A new in vitro method of cement mantle
measurement is described. Exact plastic replicas of six contemporary designs
were implanted into cadaver femora using modern techniques and following the
manufacturers' instructions. One-millimeter thick axial images were obtained
every five millimeters with a high-speed helical CT scanner. Computer
assisted analysis of mantle thickness was performed. A deficient mantle was
defined as less than two millimeters. Comparisons were made between designs.
A subset was compared to standard radiographs. Standard radiographs
overestimated thickness (p<0.05) and underestimated the deficiencies.
There is significant variability in the mantle produced by different designs
(p<0.001). Commonly used designs have significant deficiencies in their
mantles.
1:30 p.m.
The
Frank Stinchfield Award:
Acetabular and Femoral Morphology: Anteversion Angle
and Implant Positioning
Masaaki Maruyama, M.D., Judy R. Feinberg, Ph.D.,
William N. Capello, M.D., James A. D'Antonio, M.D.
Morphology of the hip joint, in particular those
features germaine to the determination of acetabular and femoral anteversion
angles and offset of the femoral head, was studied in 50 male and 50 female
human skeletons with bilateral normal hip joints. Age distribution typified
that of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) population. Four distinct
configurations were identified relative to the anterior acetabular ridge. The
majority (121,60.5%) were curved; 51 (25.5%) were angular; 19 (9.5%) were
irregular; and 9 (4.5%) were straight. The anteversion angle (AA) of the
acetabulum measured 19.9 ± 6.6º (range, 7 - 42º) and was significantly larger
in females (21.3 ± 7.1º) versus males (18.5 ± 5.8º). The notch acetabular
angle (NA), which can easily be identified intraoperatively, was defined as
the angle created at the intersection of a line from the sciatic notch along
the posterior acetabular ridge and a line from the posterior to the anterior
acetabular wal1. The NA was measured as 89.0 ± 3.5º and, as a result of being
nearly perpendicular, this angle may be useful for determining an accurate
estimate of acetabular anteversion and component placement during THA.
Knowledge of the anatomic differences found between sexes with regard to the
acetabular anteversion angle, the anterolateral bowing of the femur, and the
neck shaft angle may assist the surgeon in decreasing the relatively higher
incidence of dislocation in females and may possibly lead to different
implant designs for males and females.
1:50 p.m.
Dislocation:
The Problem
John J. Callaghan, M.D., Richard C. Johnston, M.D.,
Devon D. Goetz, M.D.
Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty is
stressful to the patient and surgeon. Prevention rather than treatment of
dislocation is preferable to the surgeon and patient. Issues related to
prevention include patient education and compliance, soft tissue
reconstruction considerations, and component positioning considerations. With
the expanded indications for primary hip surgery and the increasing need for
revision hip surgery the need for preoperative education and, especially in
the early postoperative period, postoperative compliance is essential. In
fact some patient compliance is probably necessary throughout life as 20% of
dislocations occur after five years. Over the past decade, the use of
modularity and higher offset stems have enabled the surgeon to adequately
reconstruct the soft tissues of the hip without performing trochanteric
osteotomy. However the surgeon must understand that some aspects of
modularity including skirted modular heads and extended liners can also
compromise stability. When the present authors switched to small modular
heads the dislocation rate significantly increases.
In addition to soft tissue considerations the
surgeon needs to be aware of bony impingement to include peripheral osteophytes.
Accurate component positioning requires proper positioning of the patient at
the time of surgery as well as identifying bony landmarks and using trial
components intra-operatively to adequately position the acetabular component
in the 30 to 50 degree “safe abduction zone” and to avoid retroversion of
either component. Especially in the revision situation, in the lower demand
patient, when adequate stability cannot be obtained consideration should be
given to the use of constrained acetabular components. Postoperative bracing
or casting can also be helpful. Dislocation, especially in the revision
situation has been reduced with this approach (constrained components or
early immobilization). These considerations will help minimize dislocation
but will never eliminate the problem.
2:00 p.m.
Reduction
of Early Posterior Dislocation Following Posterolateral Approach in Primary
Total Hip Replacement by Formal Posterior Capsular Repair
Richard E. White, Jr., M.D., Timothy J. Forness,
M.D.,
James K. Allman, P.A.C. and Daniel W. Junick, M.D.
The posterolateral surgical approach with complete
posterior capsulectomy for total hip replacement is complicated by a
significant incidence of early posterior dislocation. Formal repair of the
posterior capsule and short external rotator tendons has been described as an
approach modification to reduce the incidence of this early complication. The
purpose of the study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative
dislocation in the first six months following primary total hip replacement
using the posterior capsulectomy technique and the posterior capsular repair
technique. The identical posterolateral approach was used in all primary
total hip replacement patients with the exception of management of the
posterior capsule. The posterior capsulectomy technique (Group I) involved
complete excision of the posterior capsule with no attempt at repair or
reattachment of the short external rotators. Group I had 1,078 total hip
replacements. The posterior capsular repair technique (Group II) involved
reattachment of a broad flap of posterior capsule and short external rotators
through drill holes in the posterior border of the greater trochanter. Group
II had 437 total hip replacements. Only dislocations noted in the first six
months were recorded because this is the high-risk period during which the
posterior capsule is either reforming or re-adhering. In Group I (posterior
capsulectomy), 52 of 1,078 total hip replacements (4.8%) had an early
posterior dislocation. In Group II (posterior capsular repair), 3 of 437
total hip replacements (0.7%) had an early posterior dislocation. This
difference was statistically significant. Internal rotation was reduced by
approximately 50% by the reattachment process. No external rotation contracture
was noted. A small avulsion fracture of the greater trochanter was noted in 4
of 437 total hip replacements (0.9%). The posterior capsular flap could not
be reattached in 3 of 437 total hip replacements (0.7%). In posterolateral approach in primary total hip replacement, formal reattachment of the
posterior capsule and short external rotators resulted in a statistically
significant reduction of posterior dislocations when compared to patients who
had complete posterior capsulectomy.
2:10 p.m.
Dislocations
in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Direct Lateral Approach
Harry A. Demos, M.D., Cecil H. Rorabeck, M.D.,
FRCSC, FACS,
Robert B Bourne, M.D., FRCSC
Instability following a total hip arthroplasty is a
serious complication. Dislocation rates up to 6.5% following posterior
approaches have been reported within the last decade. For this reason, our
institution favors the direct lateral approach for primary and revision total
hip arthroplasty.
A review of our arthroplasty database yielded 1,515 primary
total hip arthroplasties performed via a direct lateral approach in 1,333
patients. These arthroplasties were all performed within a 10-year period and
patients with follow-up data of less than 12 months were excluded. At most
recent examination, 11.7% of the patients had a moderate or severe limp and
2.6% had severe heterotopic ossification. Only 5 hips (0.33%) had a
dislocation or episode of instability. Two patients had more that one
dislocation and required revision surgery.
The results of this study demonstrate that
dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty can be nearly eliminated
with the use of the direct lateral approach. The associated risks of
heterotopic ossification or limp are felt to be acceptable.
2:20 p.m.
Component
Positioning
William N. Capello, M.D., James A. D'Antonio, M.D.,
Michael Cusick, M.S., Masaaki Muaruyama, M.D., Ph.D.
Proper component positioning is essential if
post-operative dislocations are to be avoided. We undertook a computer
analysis of ROM of a total hip prosthetic construct using impingement as an
end point in order to determine the effect of component position on hip
stability and ROM. The ideal position for maximal motion in all planes before
impingement was 45 degrees of abduction and 25 degrees of flexion of the
acetabular component with the femoral component in 15 degrees of anteversion.
Increased abduction to 55 degrees allowed more motion than less abduction (35
degrees). Other factors that influence stability were femoral neck geometry,
head diameter, and neck diameter. A cadaveric anatomic study was done to look
at the relationship of the greater sciatic notch and acetabular anteversion.
It was found to reflect anteversion accurately and is easily accessible at
surgery. Finally two of the authors (WNC and JAD) routinely use the posterior
approach in total hip arthroplasty and use only internal landmarks for
acetabular orientation particularly the greater sciatic notch. Both
contributed patients to a multi-centered prospective randomized controlled
study investigating a ceramic on ceramic bearing used with a hydroxyapitite
coated stem and either a HA coated socket or a porous coated socket, and into
a continued access extension of the study. A total 717 hips were entered into
this study nationwide. Nineteen dislocations have occurred for a rate of
2.6%. The two authors contributed 225 patients one of whom has dislocated for
a rate of 0.4%. If one subtracts the authors patients from the 717 the
dislocation rate increases to 3.6% (18/492) p<.05. We believe that
dislocations with the posterior approach can be reduced if proper component
positioning is understood and internal bony landmarks are used to orient the
components.
2:30 p.m.
Dislocation
Treatment
Daniel J. Berry, M.D.
Treatment of recurrent hip dislocation in part is
predicated upon understanding the etiology of the hip dislocation. Implant
malposition usually is treated with component repositioning; soft tissue
tension problems usually are treated with procedures designed to re-tension
the soft tissues (using modular implants, component revision or greater
trochanteric advancement) and problems with prosthetic or extra-articular
impingement usually are treated with procedures designed to remove the source
of impingement.
Not all patients with a dislocation problem have a
clearly definable etiology and even for those with a clearly definable
etiology not all problems can be solved with the methods outlined above.
Fortunately, other methods of treating recurrent hip dislocation are
available: these include conversion to a constrained socket, conversion to a
bipolar hemiarthroplasty and conversion to a non-constrained socket with a
very large bipolar or monopolar femoral head. Each of these methods have
theoretical and practical advantages and disadvantages, which will be
discussed in this paper.
Data from analysis of the various methods used to
treat recurrent dislocation over the last three decades of total hip
arthroplasty will be presented that demonstrate how operative methods of
treating recurrent dislocation have evolved over time. The early and mid-term
success rates associated with each of the available techniques to treat
dislocation will be delineated.
3:05 p.m.
Component
and Cement Removal in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Wayne G. Paprosky, M.D., FACS, Steven H. Weeden,
M.D., and Jack W Bowling, Jr., M.D.
One of the first steps in revision hip arthroplasty
surgery is the extraction of retained components prior to surgical
reconstruction. In revision arthroplasty, the removal of well-fixed
components and cement can be extremely demanding, time consuming, and
damaging to the remaining host bone. Competent preoperative planning is
imperative and assures that the appropriate equipment is accessible.
Furthermore, preoperative planning aids in determining the proper extraction
technique best suited for each particular implant. The preservation of host bone
stock is of utmost importance, especially during the extraction of well-fixed
cementless components. The revision of acetabular components may only require
polyethylene exchange. In contrast, the removal of cemented acetabular
components and well-fixed porous coated implants can be dangerous, especially
in cases with mediallized acetabular components. One may elect to section the
acetabular implant prior to removal in an attempt to preserve bone. During
femoral implant removal, restricted access to the in-growth surface or cement
may make component removal exceedingly difficult and increase the risk of
iatrogenic damage to the remaining femoral bone. A preponderance of femoral
components and the surrounding cement can be removed without the use of any trochanteric
osteotomy. However, the use of an extended proximal femoral osteotomy may
hasten implant removal, simplify cement removal, and protect the remaining
bone stock These emerging implant removal techniques should allow the
orthopaedic surgeon to extract both acetabular and femoral components
skillfully and expeditiously, thus improving the efficacy of reconstruction.
Our results in patients with noncemented porous coated acetabular component
removal and noncemented femoral component removal are described.
3:20 p.m.
Component
And Cement Removal: How I Do It
William Hozack, M.D.
Experience is the best educator. Careful
pre-operative planning minimizes complications and maximizes clinical
results. Standardization of instrumentation with careful elimination of all
superfluous tools makes the intra-operative experience more pleasant for both
surgeon and surgical team. However, a full range of tools and equipment is
crucial. A systematic approach to surgical exposure and component or cement
removal is critical. On the other hand, the surgeon must have the flexibility
and adaptability to change course in mid-operation should the situation
dictate. Whatever surgical approach is chosen, the surgeon must have the
ability intra-operatively to expand the exposure.
Keep things simple. If there are two ways to solve a
situation that are equally appropriate, choose the way that is the simplest
and easiest.
Preoperative planning
- Evaluate
all possible scenarios – don’t assume that plan A will work.
- If
a component does not need to be removed, make sure the previous
operative report is available to identify special component or equipment
needs.
- Assess
the need for special or extended approaches.
Surgical approach
Any approach used for
revision surgery should have the potential to be expanded incrementally into
a more extensile exposure.
Acetabular component and cement removal
- Simple
liner exchange – removing the liner may not be so simple. Specific
techniques and instruments may be required.
- Cementless
socket removal - a small number of instruments can suffice think long
and hard about the need to remove a well-fixed cementless socket
- Intra-pelvic
cement/socket – special techniques can eliminate the need for an
intra-pelvic approach
Cementless stem removal
- The
status of stem fixation (stable/unstable, bone ingrown/fibrous fixation)
as well as the extent of the porous coat allows the surgeon to make
strategic decisions regarding approach and tool requirements.
- In
a stable, bone ingrown stem, the surgeon must question the need for stem
removal. Should it be necessary, the extent of the porous coating will
determine the need for extensile exposures.
Cemented stem removal
- Remove
the proximal bone and cement
- Disrupt
the cement-prosthesis interface
- Extract
the component
Cement removal
- Using
a pre-existing cement mantle (with or without internal surface
modifications) may be a suitable approach. In these cases, removal of
the entire cement mantle may be unnecessary.
- Hand
tools are the workhorses of cement removal.
- Special
tools (ultrasonic, high speed drills) have special uses.
3:45 p.m.
Femoral
Revision: Impaction Grafting
G. A. Gie, M.D.
The Exeter experience with Impaction Femoral Bone
Grafting now extends to almost 14 years. It was introduced in 1987 in view of
the poor results with simple re-cementing of femoral components and use of
proximally coated uncemented stems. The aim was to achieve component
stability in the presence of poor bone stock, to restore bone stock while
loading the proximal femur, eliminate the need for long stems and to improve
the prospects of further revision surgery in younger patients.
The first 68 cases performed without specific
instrumentation have been reviewed on a regular basis. Besides 3 early
re-revisions for technical errors, only 3 further femoral revisions have been
required, 1 at 7.5 years for a non-union of an intra-operative femoral
fracture, one for deep infection after cup revision where the stem remained
well fixed and one for sepsis at 12 years. At an average follow-up now
exceeding 11 years, there has been no recurrence of endosteal bone lysis and
there are no impending revisions for loosening. Bone stock recovery in this
group of patients has been impressive.
In late 1990 dedicated impaction instruments were
introduced into clinical practice. These allowed for improved packing and
better alignment of femoral components but led to increased intra-operative
fractures. The continued use of short stems in Grade 3 femora led to an
unacceptable incidence of post-operative femoral shaft fractures. These
complications were overcome by the more liberal use of prophylactic cerclage
wires and use of wire meshes and strut grafts. For the problem of lysis near
the stem tip, a fully tapered 205mm stem was introduced to bypass such
defects. It also became clear that long stems are occasionally required, such
that, with the recent upgrade of impaction instruments, specific instruments
have been designed for long stem use.
In Exeter we remain enthusiastic about Impaction
Femoral Grafting. Clinical and radiological results indicate that good
long-term success can be expected. Survivorship to 12 years is 94%. The
causes of complications and concerns with regard to cement mantle thickness
have been addressed. The technique is particularly attractive for the young
patient with bone stock loss but there is little doubt that the clue to
success is surgical technique.
3:55 p.m.
Femoral
Revision: Titanium Modular
David A. Mattingly, M.D.
Advantages of proximally coated titanium modular
stems include: optimum proximal and distal fit and fill occur independently;
the sleeve is oriented independent of stem to maximize contact with best
available proximal bone converting proximal sheer and hoop stresses to
compressive load to prevent proximal stress shielding; the femoral stem is
not weakened by porous coating and is placed independently of the sleeve to
provide maximum joint stability; the low modular titanium stem has distal
flutes for rotational stability and a distal clothespin to increase
flexibility and decrease end stem thigh pain; and complete modularity allows
“off-the-shelf” customization to manage all types of femoral revisions.
Five to nine year follow-ups of 47 hips at our
institution revealed stems to be ingrown in 93%, stable fibrous in 5% and
unstable in 2%. The seven-year radiographic survivorship was 92% with no
osteolysis distal to the porous sleeve. Proximal femoral trabecular
consolidation and/or hypertrophy occurred in 80.6%. Clinical results were
good or excellent in 82%, fair in 9% and poor in 9%.
Modular titanium stems provide clinical results
superior to unitized cemented or proximally coated cementless stems while
avoiding proximal stress shielding seen in fully porous stems.
4:05 p.m.
Cementless
Femoral Revision Arthroplasty: Minimum Five Year Follow-Up
John R. Moreland, M.D.
Between January 1984 and December 1991 one hundred
eighty-five consecutive cementless femoral revision arthroplasties were
performed using extensively porous-coated cobalt-chrome stems. All patients
had their surgeries by the same surgeon and were followed prospectively until
death, stem removal or minimum five years follow-up. Twenty-nine patients
died with less than five years of follow-up. Nineteen additional patients
failed to return for a minimum five years follow-up evaluation. Thus, one
hundred thirty-seven hips were available for this minimum five-year follow-up
study series. Mean follow-up was 9.3 years (range 5 to 15.8 years). Mean age
at surgery was 62.6 years (range 27.8 to 86.2 years). Ten (7 %) of the stems
have been removed. Only five (4 %) have been removed for fixation problems.
Four of these five were not bone ingrown and were re-revised. The fifth stem
removed for fixation failure was bone ingrown but had significant thigh pain.
The stem was removed and a cemented stem was placed with a good result. The
other five of the ten removed stems required removal for infection (one early
and four late infections).
Excluding the one stem removed for early infection
and using Engh radiographic criteria, 83.1 % of the stems (N = 136) achieved
bone ingrowth. Late failure of bone ingrowth was not observed. Canal filling
prostheses were more likely to have bone ingrowth as were stems placed in
femurs with lesser degrees of bone stock deficiency. Significant thigh pain
was seen in 7.1 % of bone ingrown stems, 16 % of stable fibrous fixated
stems, and 75 % of unstable stems. Significant thigh pain in bone ingrown
stems was seen more commonly in osteoporotic femurs and bone stock deficient
femurs. Severe stress shielding correlated with pre-operative osteoporosis
and larger diameter stems. No failures due to stress shielding have been
identified.
Other component reoperations were: 16 (11.7 %) for
acetabular loosening, 4 (2.9 %) for wear, and 3 (2.2 %) for dislocation.
4:15 p.m.
Reconstruction
Of Acetabular Bone Loss During Revision THA
Impaction Morsellized Grafting And Cement
Tom J.J.H. Slooff, M.D., Ph.D., B. Willem Schreurs,
M.D., Ph.D.,
Jean W.M. Gardeniers, M.D., Ph.D., Pieter Buma, Ph.D.
The major problem in revision total hip surgery is
the loss of bone stock, which frequently results in combined central and
peripheral cavitary segmental defects at the acetabular side. In 1979, a
biological method was introduced with tightly impacted cancellous allografts
in combination with a cemented polyethylene cup for the acetabular
reconstruction. With the technique it is possible to replace the loss of bone
and to repair normal hip mechanics and hip function in combination with a
standard hip prosthesis. This biological method is scientifically supported
by animal experiments and by clinical investigations. Several long-term
outcome studies both in primary total hip arthroplasty and revision have
confirmed that a long-lasting stable reconstruction can be achieved. From
human biopsies and histologic data in animal experiments it is demonstrated
that the impacted allograft was successfully incorporated.
4:25 p.m.
Cementless
Acetabular Revision at 9-15 Years
Aaron G. Rosenberg, M.D., Laura Quigley, R.N.,
Joshua J. Jacobs, M.D.,
Rich Berger, M.D., Jorge O. Galante, M.D.
From 1983 to 1988 we revised 176 failed cemented
cups with cementless acetabular sockets in 167 patients. Implants were placed
line to line with supplemental screws. 35 patients died prior to 9 years
(none requiring revision) leaving 139 components in which 33 had less than
9-year follow-up (none requiring revision) leaving 106 hips for radiographic
and clinical evaluation at an average of 130 (102-169) months.
Of the original 176 revised sockets, bulk structural
graft was required in 9 cases (5%). All grafts healed radiographically. At
final follow up, 87% of cups were radiographically stable and not revised,
however, 7% were radiographically and clinically stable but required
revision: 5 for recurrent dislocation, 5 for late sepsis and 2 were revised
at the time of loose stem revision at 71 and 75 months. No revisions for
aseptic loosening were required.
An additional 4% (7) were noted to have 4 of 5
modified Charnley zones with radiolucent lines (RLL) of <2 mm and were considered
possibly unstable, while 4 cups (2%) were unstable demonstrating migration or
RLL of >2mm in 4/5 zones.
No screw breakage was seen, but at the cup
periphery, separation of the, fiber metal pad from the underlying shell was
seen in 2 cases, with pad fragmentation noted in 11 additional cases (noted
at an average of 113.6 months). 2 cases had lucencies about a single screw
while 12 additional cases demonstrated periacetabular lytic lesions at the
component periphery. These were noted at an average of 118 (59-166) months.
None have required treatment to date.
Following the principles of obtaining intrinsic
mechanical stability via debridement and reshaping of remaining bone, the use
of dome screws, allograft particulate bone to manage defects, and the rare
use of the high hip center, cementless acetabular revision remains the
treatment of choice in 95% of our socket reconstructions. Indications for
cages or bulk grafts include combined findings of superior migration over 3
centimeters combined with medial protrusion and loss of posterior column
support.
4:35 p.m.
Bridging
Massive Acetabular Defects with the Triflange Cup:
Two to Nine-Year Results
Michael J. Christie, M.D., Steven A. Barrington,
M.D.,
Martha F. Brinson, M.S.N., David K. DeBoer, M.D.
An unresolved issue in total hip arthroplasty is
acetabular reconstruction when there is bone loss that results in pelvic
discontinuity, that involves radiation-compromised bone stock, or that is
significant enough to exceed the limits of jumbo hemispherical cups.
Achieving pain relief and initial and long-term implant stability on host
bone are the major goals of this type of reconstruction. Seventy-nine hips in
77 patients in which a large acetabular defect was bridged using a
custom-designed, triflanged component were retrospectively reviewed. The
preoperative deficiency was classified as a combined deficiency in 40 cases
and as a pelvic discontinuity in the other 39. There were 8 primary and 71
revision cases. Six patients died prior to achieving a minimum of 2 years
follow-up. With 5 patients considered lost to follow-up, there were 68 hips
in 66 patients with an average follow-up of 53 months (range 24-107 months).
No triflange cup has been removed. Pain scores improved from a mean of 16/44
preoperatively to 40/44 postoperatively. Radiographically there are two cases
of incompletely healed discontinuities but both patients are asymptomatic.
The dislocation rate is 17.4%. The triflange cup offers an alternative method
of repair that reliably provides pain relief, initial and long-term implant
stability, and pelvic stability in cases of discontinuity.
OFFICERS OF THE HIP SOCIETY
President:
Leo Whiteside, M. D.
1st
Vice President:
Benjamin Bierbaum, M.D.
2nd
Vice President:
Miguel Cabanela, M.D.
Secretary-Treasurer:
John Callaghan, M. D.
Chairman
of the Education Committee:
Robert Barrack, M.D.
Member-at-Large,
Board of Directors:
Clive Duncan, M.D.
OFFICERS OF THE AAHKS
President:
Richard B. Welch, M.D.
First
Vice-President:
John J. Callaghan, M.D.
Secomd
Vice-President:
Douglas A. Dennis, M.D.
Third
Vice President:
Clifford W. Colwell, M.D.
Secretary:
Joseph C. McCarthy, M.D.
Treasurer:
William Hozack, M.D.
Members-At-Large:
James P. Crutcher, M.D.
Michael D. Ries, M.D.
Carlos Lavernia, M.D.
James Stiehl, M.D.
Immediate
Past President:
James A. Rand, M.D.
Educational
Committee Chair:
Douglas A. Dennis, M.D.
Membership
Committee Chair:
Kenneth Krackow, M.D. |